journal article
From Paris and Beijing to Washington and Brasilia The Grand Design of Capital Cities and the Early Plans for Quezon CityPhilippine Studies: Historical & Ethnographic Viewpoints
Vol. 64, No. 1, City Beautiful: Benedict Anderson: A Symposium (mar 2016)
, pp. 43-71 (29 pages)
Published By: Ateneo de Manila University
//www.jstor.org/stable/26621882
Read and download
Log in through your school or library
Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.
Already have an account? Log in
Monthly Plan
- Access everything in the JPASS collection
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
Yearly Plan
- Access everything in the JPASS collection
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
Abstract
Political leaders have always sought to build monumental capitals, with earlier designs influencing those of later cities. The Western design that revolved around a central axis of power became evident in some Asian capitals, although cities in the Chinese cultural realm differed in shape but nonetheless had its own axis of power. This article provides a typology of capital cities and from this perspective it explores the design of the newly created capital of Quezon City in the late 1930s. Quezon City's design embraced some design ideas from elsewhere, but it remained unique. However, the design was not realized entirely.
Journal Information
Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints is an internationally refereed journal that publishes scholarly articles and other materials on the history of the Philippines and its peoples, both in the homeland and overseas. It believes the past is illuminated by historians as well as scholars from other disciplines; at the same time, it prefers ethnographic approaches to the history of the present. It welcomes works that are theoretically informed but not encumbered by jargon. It promotes a comparative and transnational sensibility, and seeks to engage scholars who may not be specialists on the Philippines. Founded in 1953 as Philippine Studies, the journal is published quarterly by the Ateneo de Manila University.
Publisher Information
The School of Social Sciences is a constituent member of the Loyola Schools of the Ateneo de Manila University. It houses the seven academic disciplines of Communication, Economics, Education, History, Political Science, Psychology, and Sociology-Anthropology as well as the five interdisciplinary programs of Chinese Studies, Development Studies, European Studies, Japanese Studies, and Southeast Asian Studies. It is committed to equip individuals and communities with perspectives and skills for local, national, and global transformation. It pursues this mission through multidisciplinary teaching, research, creative work, and outreach initiatives, prepares individuals to be competent, ethical, and responsive to local and global social realities. It is guided by the Jesuit tradition of excellence, service, and the promotion of justice.
Rights & Usage
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Philippine Studies: Historical & Ethnographic Viewpoints © 2016
Ateneo de Manila University
Request Permissions