It is important for researchers to efficiently conduct quality literature studies. Hence, a structured and efficient approach is essential. We overview work that has demonstrated the potential for using software tools in literature reviews. We highlight the untapped opportunities in using an end-to-end tool-supported literature review methodology. Qualitative data-analysis tools such as NVivo are immensely useful as a means to analyze, synthesize, and write up literature reviews. In this paper, we describe how to organize and prepare papers for analysis and provide detailed guidelines for actually coding and analyzing papers, including detailed illustrative strategies to effectively write up and present the results. We present a detailed case study as an illustrative example of the proposed approach put into practice. We discuss the means, value, and also pitfalls of applying tool-supported literature review approaches. We contribute to the literature by proposing a four-phased tool-supported methodology that serves as best practice in conducting literature reviews in IS. By viewing the literature review process as a qualitative study and treating the literature as the " data set " , we address the complex puzzle of how best to extract relevant literature and justify its scope, relevance, and quality. We provide systematic guidelines for novice IS researchers seeking to conduct a robust literature review. Show
Ariel Nube 79% found this document useful (24 votes) 11K views 2 pages Practical
Research I © © All Rights Reserved DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd Did you find this document useful?Is this content inappropriate?Report this Document 79% found this document useful (24 votes) 11K views2 pages Second Periodic Exam SHS - Practical Research 1 2017Uploaded byAriel Nube Description:Practical Research I Full description Between world knowledge and review of related literature (RRL), the second serves as ______________.This is a List of Available Answers Options :
The best answer is C. Summary. Reported from teachers around the world. The correct answer to ❝Between world knowledge and review of related literature (RRL), the second serves as
______________.❞ question is C. Summary. What is belajar.dhafi.link Site?Dhafi Quiz Is an online learning educational site to provide assistance and insight to students who are in the learning stage. they will be able to easily find answers to questions at school.We strive to publish Encyclopedia quizzes that are useful for students. All facilities here are 100% Free. Hopefully, Our site can be very useful for you. Thank you for visiting. 4.Your purpose in doing RRL is Get answer to your question and much more 5.Research question is a must in a literature review calleda.traditionalc.systematicb.optionald.structural 6.Subjective literature review takes place in a review that is Get answer to your question and much more 7.Among the types of traditional review, these two share some similarities. Get answer to your question and much more 8.A year from now, I will start my thesis writing for my MA degree. I mustthen look forward to doing this RRL style. Get answer to your question and much more 9.Being a first year BA student, I can conduct a literature review using this stylea.systematic and traditionalc.systematicb.multi-systemd.traditional 10.Without research questions, your RRL structure can appear in a form called Get answer to your question and much more ActivityDirections:Explain each expression the way you understood them in relation toresearch.1.Related Literature2.Review of Related Literature3.Traditional review of Literature What style of RRL summarizes present forms of knowledge on a specific subject?Traditional Review of Literature: - To summarize present forms of knowledge on a specific subject - Aims to give and expanded or new understanding of an existing work - Is prone to subjectivity - Does not require you to describe your method of reviewing but expects you to state your intentions in conducting the review ...
Which of the following is the purpose of RRL?Answer: A review of related literature (RRL) is important for obtaining an overview of the current knowledge on the topic. It provides the investigator with a framework on which to build an appropriate hypothesis.
|