The machiavellian personality is characterized by the will to manipulate and the desire for power.

The current study investigated the influence of Machiavellianism, a personality trait characterized by a manipulative interpersonal style and willingness to exploit others (Christie & Geis, 1970), on three areas of sexual behavior. Men (N = 90) and women (N = 192) aged 18–81 years (M = 25.82, SD = 9.85) completed the Mach IV (Christie & Geis, 1970), YSEX Questionnaire (Meston & Buss, 2007), Sexual Deception Scale (Marelich, Lundquist, Painter, & Mechanic, 2008) and Intentions Towards Infidelity Scale (Jones, Olderbak, & Figueredo, 2011). Those with high levels of Machiavellianism were more likely to engage in sexual behavior for physical reasons, goal attainment and insecurity. In particular, Machiavellian men and women endorsed stress reduction, experience seeking, resources, social status, revenge, utilitarian reasons, boosting self-esteem, duty/pressure, and mate guarding as motivations for sexual behavior. Machiavellianism was also a significant predictor of each form of sexual deception investigated (blatant lying, self-serving and avoiding confrontation) and intentions to engage in infidelity. Sex did not moderate the influence of Machiavellianism on sexual behavior.

Show

Introduction

Machiavellianism is a personality trait associated with cynicism, distrust and a willingness to exploit others (Christie and Geis, 1970, Vecchio and Sussman, 1991). Previous research demonstrates that Machiavellianism is associated with a greater number of sexual partners (McHoskey, 2001) and the use of strategies intended to avoid or reduce relationship commitment (Jonason & Buss, 2012). Thus, it is often argued that the Machiavellian interpersonal style facilitates a short-term mating strategy and thus confers an evolutionary advantage (Buss, 2009, Jonason et al., 2012). However, Machiavellianism influences a range of relationship types, suggesting that Machiavellian men and women are flexible and opportunistic (Fehr et al., 1992, Furnham et al., 2013), and decisions to engage in short or long-term relationships are dependent on the specific rewards available. The current study extends our understanding of Machiavellianism in the context of sexual behavior, and investigates the relationships between Machiavellianism, motivations for sexual activity, sexual deception and infidelity.

Personality influences many aspects of sexual activity (e.g., Fink, Brewer, & Neave, 2007), including motivation to engage in sexual behavior. Whilst previous research has established a relationship between Machiavellianism and sexual activity (e.g., Baughman et al., 2014, Goncalves and Campbell, 2014, Veselka et al., 2014), specific motivations for sexual behavior have not been considered. According to Meston and Buss (2007), there are a range of reasons (categorized as physical reasons, goal attainment, emotional reasons and insecurity) for engaging in sexual behavior. Physical reasons include stress reduction, pleasure, physical desirability, and experience seeking. Goal attainment includes resources, social status, revenge and utilitarian reasons. Emotional motivations include love and commitment and expression and insecurity includes boosting self-esteem, duty/pressure and mate guarding. The exploitative, opportunistic nature of Machiavellianism (Christie and Geis, 1970, Jones and Paulhus, 2009) in which other people are viewed as a ‘means to an end’, suggests that men and women with high levels of Machiavellianism may be most motivated by individual reward. Specifically, we predict that Machiavellianism will be positively related to engaging in sexual behavior in order to achieve a particular goal such as the acquisition of social status or to guard a mate, but not related to those motivations (e.g., love and commitment) reflecting emotional closeness and intimacy.

Sexual deception is widespread and a substantial number of men and women routinely withhold or amend information relating to their sexual history. For example, Lucchetti (1999) demonstrates that over 25% of individuals lower their actual number of previous sexual partners before disclosing to a current mate. Individuals are also often dishonest in relation to the identity of previous sexual partners and previous incidence of infidelity (Williams, 2001). Previous research documents the manner in which personality influences the use (Riggio et al., 1988, Seto et al., 1997) and detection of deception (Lyons, Healy, & Bruno, 2013). Furthermore, the ability to deceive is an important aspect of the Machiavellian interpersonal style (Christie & Geis, 1970). In particular, individuals with high levels of Machiavellianism create more plausible lies and demonstrate confidence in their ability to deceive (Giammarco, Atkinson, Baughman, Veselka, & Vernon, 2013) which maintains the appearance of truthfulness (Exline, Thibaut, Hickey, & Gumpert, 1970). Machiavellian men and women also control the type and depth of personal information they reveal to others (within platonic relationships) (Abell and Brewer, 2014, Brewer et al., 2014) which facilitates manipulation and may hinder the detection of blatant lies by deceived relationship partners. Those with high levels of Machiavellianism also appear willing to deceive romantic/sexual partners. For example, men and women with high levels of Machiavellianism are more likely to employ deceptive mating strategies, though for women this relationship is moderated by previous sexual history (Dussault, Hojjat, & Boone, 2013). Therefore, the present study investigates the influence of Machiavellianism on sexual deception. We predict the greater use of each sexual deception type by those with higher levels of Machiavellianism.

Though infidelity (Saxe, 1991) threatens the stability of a romantic relationship (Betzig, 1989), approximately 20% of men and women report that they have engaged in a sexual affair during their current relationship (Mark, Janssen, & Milhausen, 2011). Furthermore, those that are unfaithful to a current partner are also likely to have been unfaithful in prior relationships (Adamopoulou, 2013). A range of personality traits including psychoticism (Buss & Shackleford, 1997) and sensation seeking (Lalasz & Weigel, 2011) are associated with extra-dyadic behaviors. In particular, those with high levels of Machiavellianism are more likely to ‘poach’ another person’s partner or themselves be poached from a current relationship (Jonason, Li, & Buss, 2010). It is unclear however whether the relationship between Machiavellianism and infidelity reflects a lower commitment to the primary partner (i.e., willingness to remain faithful) or other factors such as increased attractiveness and subsequent greater opportunities for infidelity. Hence, the present study considers intended infidelity. We predict that Machiavellian men and women will be more willing to engage in infidelity than those with low levels of the trait.

In the present study, men and women were invited to complete a series of online questionnaires measuring Machiavellianism, motivations to engage in sexual behavior, sexual deception and willingness to engage in infidelity. We predict that Machiavellian men and women will report a greater motivation to engage in sexual behavior in order to achieve a particular goal such as the acquisition of resources or social status. Men and women with higher levels of Machiavellianism are also predicted to use greater sexual deception and report a higher intention to engage in infidelity. Based on previous research reporting sex differences in Machiavellianism (McHoskey, 2001), sexual motivation (e.g., Meston & Buss, 2007), deception (Keenan et al., 1997, Rowatt et al., 1998), infidelity (e.g., Wiederman, 1997), and the extent to which Machiavellianism influences behavior (Brewer et al., 2014), the moderating role of gender is also considered.

Section snippets

Participants

Men (N = 90) and women (N = 192) aged 18–81 years (M = 25.82, SD = 9.85) were recruited through research websites (e.g., onlinepsychresearch.co.uk) and social networking sites. The majority of participants were in a serious relationship (52.50%) at the time of the study, followed by those who were single (35.80%) and in a casual relationship (11.70%). For those in a relationship, length of relationship ranged from 1 month to 40 years (M = 4.12 months, SD = 5.77 months).

Materials and procedure

Participants completed a series of online

Results

Participants completed standardized measures assessing motivations for engaging in sexual behavior, sexual deception and intention to engage in infidelity. Descriptive statistics and correlations for all variables are presented in Table 1. A series of multiple regressions were conducted to investigate the extent to which Machiavellianism predicted sexual behavior. The influence of sex was also investigated, both as an individual predictor of sexual behavior and as a moderator of the

Discussion

The current study demonstrates that men and women with high levels of Machiavellianism were more likely to engage in sexual behavior for physical reasons, goal attainment and insecurity. In particular, Machiavellian men and women endorsed stress reduction, experience seeking, resources, social status, revenge, utilitarian reasons, boosting self-esteem, duty/pressure, and mate guarding as motivations for sexual behavior. Together, these findings suggest that Machiavellianism influences

References (56)

  • L. Veselka et al.

    The Dark Triad and the seven deadly sins

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2014)

  • T.K. Shackelford et al.

    Universal dimensions of human mate preferences

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2005)

  • M.C. Seto et al.

    Deception and sexual strategy in psychopathy

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (1997)

  • G. Rodriguez-Arauz et al.

    Sexual behavior in Costa Rica and the United States

    International Journal of Intercultural Relations

    (2013)

  • R.E. Riggio et al.

    Personality and deception ability

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (1988)

  • H. Riemer et al.

    Impression management in survey responding: Easier for collectivists or individualists?

    Journal of Consumer Psychology

    (2011)

  • D.L. Paulhus et al.

    The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy

    Journal of Research in Personality

    (2002)

  • B.A. Mcleod et al.

    Predicting the acceptability and likelihood of lying: The Interaction of personality with type of lie

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2008)

  • J. McHoskey

    Machiavellianism and sexuality: On the moderating role of biological sex

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2001)

  • M. Lyons et al.

    It takes one to know one: Relationship between lie detection and psychopathy

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2013)

  • C.B. Lalasz et al.

    Understanding the relationship between gender and extradyadic relations: The mediating role of sensation seeking on intentions to engage in sexual infidelity

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2011)

  • P.K. Jonason et al.

    The costs and benefits of the Dark Triad: Implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2010)

  • P.K. Jonason et al.

    Avoiding entangling commitments: Tactics for implementing a short-term mating strategy

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2012)

  • R.R. Holden et al.

    When does random responding distort self-report personality assessment? An example with the NEO PI-R

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2012)

  • L. Grovle et al.

    Poor agreement found between self-report and a public registry on duration of sickness absence

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

    (2012)

  • D. Greenwood et al.

    Fame and the social self: The need to belong, narcissism, and relatedness predict the appeal of fame

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2013)

  • M.K. Goncalves et al.

    The Dark Triad and the derogation of mating competitors

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2014)

  • E.A. Giammarco et al.

    Vengeance and the Dark Triad: The role of empathy and perspective taking in trait forgiveness

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2014)

  • E.A. Giammarco et al.

    The relation between antisocial personality and the perceived ability to deceive

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2013)

  • B. Fink et al.

    Instrumentality and lifetime number of sexual partners

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2007)

  • D.M. Buss et al.

    Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year of marriage

    Journal of Research in Personality

    (1997)

  • H.M. Baughman et al.

    Four shades of sexual fantasies linked to the Dark Triad

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2014)

  • J. Allik

    National differences in personality

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2012)

  • E. Adamopoulou

    New facts on infidelity

    Economics Letters

    (2013)

  • L. Abell et al.

    Machiavellianism, self-monitoring, self-promotion and relational aggression on Facebook

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2014)

  • L.S. Aiken et al.

    Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions

    (1991)

  • L. Betzig

    Causes of conjugal dissolution: A cross-cultural study

    Current Anthropology

    (1989)

  • G. Brewer et al.

    Machiavellianism, competition and self-disclosure in friendship

    Individual Differences Research

    (2014)

  • Navigate DownView more references

    Cited by (38)

    • Catching the catfish: Exploring gender and the Dark Tetrad of personality as predictors of catfishing perpetration

      2023, Computers in Human Behavior

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      Catfishing, the act of deceiving and exploiting another person online, can have significant negative impact on the target. To date, limited research has explored individual differences in perpetration of catfishing. We address this paucity by adopting an evolutionary psychology theoretical framework (the “cheater strategy” hypothesis) and exploring the utility of gender and the "Dark Tetrad" personality traits of psychopathy, sadism, Machiavellianism, and narcissism to predict catfishing perpetration. A sample of 664 participants (55.8% men, 40.3% women) with an average age of 28.84 years (SD = 9.60) were recruited via social media and completed an anonymous online questionnaire which comprised measures of personality and catfishing behaviours. Combined, the variables explained 62.6% of variance in catfishing perpetration. Results partially supported the hypotheses, with only psychopathy, sadism, and narcissism emerging as positive predictors of catfishing perpetration. Findings of the current study indicate that evolutionary psychology may be a useful theoretical framework when exploring antisocial online behaviours. Further, these findings provide crucial information regarding the psychological profile of a “catfish” and may have important practical implications by informing the prevention and management of this online behaviour.

    • Evidence for the superordinate predictive ability of trait psychopathy: The Dark Triad and quality of sexual life

      2022, Personality and Individual Differences

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      Novel evidence indicates that quality of sexual life is linked to the Dark Triad personality traits. However, results of Dark Triad research have often remained unreplicated, thus questioning the validity of observed effects. Here, we conceptually replicate and extend previous findings on the links of the Dark Triad to the quality of sexual life (i.e., sexual self-concept and generalized sexual satisfaction components) in a large, community-based sample (N = 896, 72% women, mean age = 28.1 years). Participants completed online self-assessments of narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and the quality of their sexual lives. Regression analyses showed that all dark traits were positively associated with higher sexual preoccupation, but narcissism and psychopathy were positively linked with higher sexual motivation, self-esteem, and assertiveness, yet negatively related to anxiety and fear. Higher Machiavellianism scores were linked to more negative emotions and lower sexual motivation, self-esteem, assertiveness, and satisfaction. While aversive personality traits were predictive of sexual self-concept and satisfaction, the superordinate predictive value of trait psychopathy raises concerns about the validity of the conceptualization of the Dark Triad as three overlapping, yet sufficiently distinct personality traits. We show that psychopathy appears to be the most important aversive personality trait driving quality of sexual life.

    • Dominance or deceit: The role of the Dark Triad and hegemonic masculinity in emotional manipulation

      2020, Personality and Individual Differences

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      People may emotionally manipulate others in an attempt to control them and achieve personally satisfying outcomes. Experiencing emotional manipulation is related to several negative outcomes (e.g., depression). As a first step in addressing these negative outcomes, this study explored the utility of hegemonic masculinity and the Dark Triad (i.e., trait narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy) in predicting emotional manipulation. Three hundred and twenty-seven participants (119 men, 208 women) completed an online survey measuring hegemonic masculinity, narcissism, psychopathy, Machiavellianism, as well as their (a) perceived ability to emotionally manipulate others, and (b) willingness to engage in emotional manipulation. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that, for both men and women, hegemonic masculinity was a significant predictor of one's willingness and perceived ability to emotionally manipulate others. However, when Dark Triad traits were added to the model, hegemonic masculinity's contribution became non-significant. Hegemonic masculinity seems to share variance with Dark Triad traits, particularly Machiavellianism. These findings are important as they establish that existing operational definitions of hegemonic masculinity share features with certain ‘dark’ personality traits. Thus, when predicting antisocial behaviour and tendencies, perhaps the variance explained by hegemonic masculinity is better captured by dark personality traits.

    • Dark Triad traits and perceived quality of alternative partners

      2020, Personality and Individual Differences

      Citation Excerpt :

      Machiavellianism is characterised by cynicism, manipulation, and a willingness to exploit others (Christie & Geis, 1970). The trait is associated with low commitment to romantic partners (Jonason & Buss, 2012), increased willingness to engage in infidelity (Brewer & Abell, 2015), and resistance to a partner's mate guarding behaviour (Abell & Brewer, 2016). Those high on Machiavellianism also view others as a ‘means to an end’ and engage in sexual behaviour in order to achieve a specific goal, such as an increase in resources or social status (Brewer & Abell, 2015).

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      Those high on Dark Triad traits (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy) report poor quality romantic relationships and greater susceptibility to infidelity. The present study investigated the relationship between Dark Triad traits and the perceived quality of alternative partners. Heterosexual women (NȂ=Ȃ379) aged 17–63 years (M = 26.93, SD = 10.78) completed the NPI-16, Mach IV, Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale, and Quality of Alternatives Scale. A multiple hierarchical regression revealed that the Dark Triad traits predicted perceived quality of alternatives when controlling for participant age and relationship length. Narcissism and Machiavellianism were the only significant individual predictors, such that women high on narcissism or Machiavellianism were more likely to acknowledge the availability of alternative relationships. Increased awareness of alternative mates may, in part, contribute to previously reported associations between these traits, poor quality relationships, and infidelity.

    • Sexy deeds done dark? Examining the relationship between dark personality traits and sexual motivation

      2019, Personality and Individual Differences

      Citation Excerpt :

      Although some studies have examined the links between ‘lighter’ personality (e.g., the Five Factor Model) and sexual motivations (e.g., Heaven et al., 2003; Meston & Buss, 2007), to our knowledge, there has only been one study examining any component of dark personality and sexual motivations. Brewer and Abell (2015) correlated Machiavellianism with a measure of motivation, finding that a significant positive relationship with more self-focused reasons for having sex. This study aims to contribute to the existing literature by examining the four components of dark personality—narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism or the Dark Tetrad (Chabrol et al., 2009)—and their associations with sexual motivation.

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      The Dark Tetrad is composed of four related subclinical personality traits: narcissism, psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and sadism. Using Life History Theory (LHT) as a framework, the current study examined Dark Tetrad traits as predictors of a variety of sexual motivations and goals. Participants (N = 345) were recruited from a large southern U.S. university and completed Dark Tetrad measures and scales related to various self- and partner-focused motivations for sex. Results indicated that greater Machiavellianism was associated with being motivated to have sex for selfish reasons (for self-image concerns, to enhance the self, for stress relief and to exert power, and for pleasure), but also with partner-oriented motives (to give the partner power, and fostering emotional connection with a partner). Moreover, greater psychopathy was associated with being motivated to have sex for stress relief; conversely, greater psychopathy was associated with less partner-focused motivations. No effects were found for narcissism and sadism. Consistent with LHT, these results augment our understanding of the sexual and interpersonal experiences of those endorsing Dark Tetrad traits.

    • Be yourself: Authenticity as a long-term mating strategy

      2019, Personality and Individual Differences

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      We hypothesize that “being yourself” is the dating strategy of individuals that have successful long-term relationships. Study 1 examined the relationships between authenticity and personality variables that predict relationship outcome. Study 2 employed a two-part acts nomination design to enumerate “being yourself” while dating and to examine personality correlates of “being yourself”. Study 3 explored whether individuals being themselves are attractive and if being yourself results in assortative mating with authentic individuals. Study 4 determined the effect of “be yourself” mindset priming on “be yourself” dating behavior. Study 1 found that authenticity is associated with emotional intelligence and positive relational outcomes. Study 2 found that “being yourself” dating behavior is associated with authenticity, secure attachment, and low narcissism. Study 3 found that “be yourself” dating behavior is attractive and facilitates assortative mating with authentic individuals. Study 4 found that rejection sensitive individuals are more likely to engage in “be yourself” dating behavior when made to feel safe to be themselves. “Be yourself” is the dating strategy that authentic individuals use to facilitate successful long-term relationships.

    Arrow Up and RightView all citing articles on Scopus

    • Research article

      Narcissists’ negative perception of their counterpart’s competence and benevolence and their own reduced trust in a negotiation context

      Personality and Individual Differences, Volume 74, 2015, pp. 196-201

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      Despite its important role in interpersonal interactions, narcissism has rarely been examined in the context of negotiations in which individuals cooperate and compete with their counterpart. As negotiations occur frequently in daily life, empirical findings of the role of narcissism in negotiation settings can enhance the understanding of the functions of narcissism in common situations in which self- and other-interests are in conflict. By analyzing 35 negotiation dyads’ within-dyad differences using multilevel analysis, I found that negotiators’ narcissism was negatively related to their perception of their counterpart’s competence but was not significantly related to their individual economic gain (objective negotiation performance), suggesting narcissists’ inflated agentic self or deflated perception of their counterpart’s competence. Additionally, narcissism was negatively related to trust, due to narcissists’ negative perception of their counterpart’s benevolence rather than their counterpart’s competence. These findings contribute to the literatures on narcissism and trust.

    • Research article

      Machiavellianism on quality of life: The role of lifestyle, age, gender, social support

      Personality and Individual Differences, Volume 173, 2021, Article 110609

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      Machiavellianism (MACH) has repeatedly been proven to have a significant adverse impact on physical and mental health. Greater insight into the mechanism of this effect obtained using large samples is crucial to further understand the link between MACH and quality of life (QoL). This study explored the potential mechanism underlying the association of MACH and QoL in Chinese adolescents and undergraduates.

      A total of 6258 adolescents (age: 9 to 15) and 1161 young adults (age: 17 to 23) were recruited to complete questionnaires concerning MACH, lifestyle, social support, and QoL.

      In both samples, MACH and some of its components negatively affected QoL indirectly through lifestyle. Age, gender and social support moderated the association between MACH and lifestyle in adolescents. Social support moderated the relationship between lifestyle and QoL only in adolescents. In undergraduates, gender moderated only the relationship of MACH and QoL, and social support moderated only the association between MACH and lifestyle.

      MACH and QoL showed similar age and gender tendencies in young Chinese students. We powerfully illustrated the deleterious consequences of MACH on QoL and initially uncovered the potential mechanisms. Notably, MACH's distrust dominates the negative impact on QoL, and social support overrides age and gender in affecting the MACH-QoL associations.

    • Research article

      The Dark Triad and the quality of sexual life

      Personality and Individual Differences, Volume 149, 2019, pp. 78-82

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      This study investigated sexual functioning with respect to differences in the Dark Triad traits in a large community sample (N = 1116). The participants completed an online survey examining dark traits (Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy domains: boldness, meanness and disinhibition) and measures of sexual functioning. The Dark Triad traits were positively associated with sexual preoccupation in both sexes. Compared to the participants lower in dark traits, those with higher narcissism and boldness reported higher sexual motivation, sexual self-esteem and sexual assertiveness and lower negative emotions in the sexual context, which can be interpreted as higher quality of their sexual experience. In turn, those higher in Machiavellianism and disinhibition reported higher sexual fear and anxiety; women additionally showed lower sexual self-esteem and/or sexual assertiveness. Boldness was the only dark trait positively related to sexual satisfaction, especially in men.

    • Research article

      Nothing ventured nothing gained: Strong associations between reward sensitivity and two measures of Machiavellianism

      Personality and Individual Differences, Volume 74, 2015, pp. 112-115

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      Recent theoretical work on the Life History Theory and empirical findings on Machiavellianism suggest that Machiavellian individuals are motivated to acquire short-term benefits and prioritize situations with high potential rewards. Accordingly, in our study, we investigated the associations between reward/punishment sensitivity and Machiavellian interpersonal tactics with self-report measures. Moreover, as a first attempt, we investigated the correlates of Machiavellianism and the behavioral preference for rewards with the IOWA Gambling task (IGT). The results showed robust positive associations of Machiavellian behavioral characteristics with Sensitivity to Reward, and a moderately negative correlation with Sensitivity to Punishment. This finding was further supported by IGT: Machiavellians tended to make reward-oriented decisions.

    • Research article

      Women’s sexual competition and the Dark Triad

      Personality and Individual Differences, Volume 74, 2015, pp. 275-279

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      The Dark Triad (DT) of sub-clinical narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy has been found to be related to competitive attitudes and behaviors, chiefly in men. Using a women-only sample (n = 439), we examined the relationship of DT with general and sexual competitiveness. Factor analysis indicated that the distinction between inter- and intra-sexual competition in women may be less clear than previously conceptualized. We found significant positive correlations between DT and both general and sexual competitiveness. Regression analyses indicated that DT, and in particular, narcissism, are significant predictors of general and sexual competitiveness. These findings are discussed in relation to evolutionary theory, and directions for future work on sexual competition and DT are suggested.

    • Research article

      Risky business: Willingness to be caught in an extra-pair relationship, relationship experience, and the Dark Triad

      Personality and Individual Differences, Volume 66, 2014, pp. 204-207

      Show abstractNavigate Down

      Little research into the relationship correlates of narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism (i.e., the Dark Triad) has examined experience within various types of relationships nor has research examined risk-tolerance in extra-pair relationships. In a MTurk sample (N = 210), psychopathy and narcissism were positively correlated with low-commitment relationship experience, both overall and as extra-pair relationships. Machiavellianism was negatively correlated with overall experience in booty-call relationships, friends-with-benefits relationships, and serious-romantic relationships. Those who would not engage in extra-pair low-commitment relationships, even without chance of detection, were lower in psychopathy and narcissism than those indicating some acceptable chance of detection. Additionally, the amount of detection risk accepted was positively associated with narcissism for one-night-stands and friends-with-benefits relationships, and negatively associated with Machiavellianism for booty-call relationships. These findings further our understanding of the mating strategies of those high in the Dark Triad.

      When employees see politics as a threat they often respond with defensive behaviors?

      When people perceive politics as a threat rather than as an opportunity, they often respond with defensive behaviors reactive and protective behaviors to avoid action, blame, or charge. And defensive behaviors are often associated with negative feelings toward the job and work environment.

      What power is the ability to influence based on a formal role given to a person?

      Legitimate power This is a type of formal power that you receive when you occupy a certain position in your organization. Depending on the position, it gives you authority within the company. It also lasts as long as you remain in that role.

      Which of the following is differentiating factor between power and leadership?

      Goal compatibility differentiates both the terms as power is independent, but leadership is dependent on the achievement of goals.

      Which power tactic is most effective when an audience is highly invested in the result of a decision?

      Explanation: B) Rational persuasion, inspirational appeals, and consultation tend to be the most effective power tactics, especially when the audience is highly interested in the outcomes of a decision process.