Differences between the Mayflower Compact and the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut

Inhaltsverzeichnis Show

Constitution Convention Paper
The Articles of Confederation and The Constitution
The Birth of the United States from the Colonies
Articles Of Confederation Dbq Analysis
Thomas Jefferson
Covenanted Governments
Articles of confederation
New England And Middle Colonies Similarities
Compare And Contrast The Anemic Articles Of Confederation
Factionalism in America
What do the Mayflower Compact and the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut have in common?
What is unique about the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut?
What impact do you think the Mayflower Compact and the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut had on the creation of the United States government?
In which of these ways were the Mayflower Compact and the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut most similar?

Constitution Convention Paper
The government in Massachusetts began with the Mayflower Compact, an agreement signed by the Pilgrims pledging that they would set up a theocracy, a political system headed by the clergy. In the compact, they also pledged loyalty to support and follow England. Seven years later, the Massachusetts Bay Company, under John Winthrope, coming for economic and religious reasons, set up a general court.
- 1012 Words
- 3 Pages
The Articles of Confederation and The Constitution
In the history of the United States of America, our government has been defined by two very important documents. Reflecting on all governments of the past, they laid forth an impressive jumble of ideas that would lead the way to where we are today. These two documents are the Article of Confederation and the U.S Constitution. These two documents of precedent are both similar and unique, each with its own pros and cons, and neither being perfect. Both these documents addressed the prominent vital in national vs. state sovereignty, legislative selection process, and executive authority.
- 1248 Words
- 3 Pages
The Birth of the United States from the Colonies
After many obstacles, the formation government of the Union and the United States was coming full circle. With so many working together to promote good will for all, there could only be one outcome: a remarkable government. After defeating the British and breaking the once seemingly permanent bond with them, the new country and its people were finally “free”. Even though no government was perfect and there were still rules and limits to power and a great number of future bumps in the road, with people such as Jefferson as guides, the government of the Union, for a period at least, was one of the best.
- 1475 Words
- 3 Pages
Articles Of Confederation Dbq Analysis
During and after the turmoil of the American Revolution, the people of America, both the rich and the poor, the powerful and the meek, strove to create a new system of government that would guide them during their unsure beginning. This first structure was called the Articles of Confederation, but it was ineffective, restricted, and weak. It was decided to create a new structure to guide the country. However, before a new constitution could be agreed upon, many aspects of life in America would have to be considered. The foremost apprehensions many Americans had concerning this new federal system included fear of the government limiting or endangering their inalienable rights, concern that the government’s power would be unbalanced, both within
- 841 Words
- 2 Pages
Thomas Jefferson
In the years following, a Constitutional Convention was held in order to “form a more perfect union.” Models for the constitution consisted of forms of government such as the Magna Carta, which limited power of the king or government figure, and the Declaration of Independence. Ideas taken from the Declaration and Thomas Jefferson included points such as “We hold these truths to be self evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, among these are life…”. By mentioning the truths that are self evident, Jefferson lets the colonists know that they do indeed have rights. The Declaration was used as a model for the Constitution, through its focus on equal rights, to remind us that all men are created equal, and should be treated with the basic respect human beings deserves, along with the right to choose our destiny.
- 575 Words
- 2 Pages
Covenanted Governments
The next vital document that was created in the “New World” was the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut. This document was closely related to the Mayflower Compact in that it was made in the name of God, it established a theocracy. This document brought people together in a tacit agreement that they would obey the word of God, as interpreted by the people and the sovereign appointed (a magistrate). The fundamental Orders and the Mayflower Compact are very distinct from the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution in that they are theocracies. The people governed the letter two of the aforementioned; religion played little or no importance.
- 1583 Words
- 4 Pages
Articles of confederation
The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, although vastly different in their philosophies of governing the nation, both played a big role in setting the stage for America’s economy in the upcoming nineteenth century. A few years after the Articles of Confederation were drafted many politicians and economists, such as Alexander Hamilton, began to see problems with the decentralized form of government that was created by this document. These advocates of a more centralized government were referred to as federalists, and although they were not in favor of a dictatorship, like that of England’s, they saw the need for a central governing system to reside over the individual states.
- 533 Words
- 2 Pages
New England And Middle Colonies Similarities
The New England, Middle, and Southern colonies were similar in that they all had a parliamentary system to some extent within their government. In New England, each colony had a governor appointed by the king, however, the towns were self governed by the puritan church and community and tried to stay largely independent of the colonial government. The Middle colonies had some similarity in the representation factor but in contrast they were ruled by a board of supervisors for each county made up of one representative from each town. Similarly the Southern colonies had governors appointed by the king although he was advised by a colonial legislature made up of the wealthy land owners, furthermore increasing the power of the rich and providing
- 225 Words
- 1 Pages
Compare And Contrast The Anemic Articles Of Confederation
But although the Confederation was praiseworthy as confederations went, the troubled times demanded not a loosely woven confederation but a tightly knit federation. This involved the yielding by the states of their sovereignty to a completely recast the federal government, which in turn would leave them free to control their local affairs. In spite of their defects, the anemic Articles of Confederation were a significant steppingstone toward the present day constitution. They clearly outlined the general powers that were to be exercised by the central government. The Articles kept alive the flickering idea of the union and to hold the states all together as one. Yet, the Articles of Confederation, were weak though they were, proved to be a landmark in the government. They were, for those days, a model of what a loose confederation ought to be. Thomas Jefferson enthusiastically hailed the new construction, as the best one that was existing or tat did ever
- 304 Words
- 1 Pages
Factionalism in America
Following the failure of the Articles of Confederation, a debate arose discussing how a centralized government ought to be organized. The prevailing opinion ultimately belonged to the Federalists, whose philosophy was famously outlined in The Federalist Papers. Recognizing that in a free nation, man would naturally divide himself into factions, they chose not to remedy this problem by stopping it at its source; instead, they would limit its effects by placing strict structural safeguards within the government's framework. The Federalists defined a facti...
- 1750 Words
- 4 Pages

What do the Mayflower Compact and the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut have in common?

The similarity between the Mayflower Compact, and the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut is that in both documents it says that thy will be helped by G-d. This means that these people did not believe in separation from the church.

What is unique about the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut?

Adopted in January 1639, the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut stated the powers and limits of government. The preamble of the Fundamental Orders officially formed a confederation under the guidance of God—standing in stark contrast to today's ideas about the separation of church and state.

What impact do you think the Mayflower Compact and the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut had on the creation of the United States government?

Finally, as the first written constitution in the New World, the Mayflower Compact laid the foundations for two other revolutionary documents: the Declaration of Independence, which stated that governments derive their powers “from the consent of the governed,” and the Constitution.

In which of these ways were the Mayflower Compact and the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut most similar?

In what ways were the Mayflower Compact & Fundamental Orders of Connecticut similar? The signers of both documents had only just landed in America. In both documents, colonists agreed to establish a community and obey to its laws.