Is a consequence of a behavior that increases the likelihood that it will occur in the future?

  1. Last updated
  2. Save as PDF
  • Page ID129786
  • Behaviorist Theories

    Behaviorism is primarily concerned with observable and measurable aspects of human behavior. In defining behavior, behaviorist learning theories emphasize changes in behavior that result from stimulus-response associations made by the learner. Several social psychologists studied behavior and identified different theories on how behaviors can be learned and/or changed through reinforcement. They called this conditioning.

    John B. Watson (1878-1958) and B. F. Skinner (1904-1990) are the two principal originators of behaviorist approaches to learning. Watson believed that human behavior resulted from specific stimuli that elicited certain responses. Watson's basic premise was that conclusions about human development should be based on observation of overt behavior rather than speculation about subconscious motives or latent cognitive processes (Shaffer, 2000). He hypothesized that behavior could be dependent on the environment (culture). Watson's basic premise was that conclusions about human development should be based on observation of overt behavior rather than speculation about subconscious motives or latent cognitive processes (Shaffer, 2000). Through this experiment, he conditioned a little boy to fear a white rat by repeatedly showing the boy the rat, then introducing a scary, loud, clanking sound. In time, the young boy feared all white furry objects because he associated them with a scary, loud noise.

    Watson's theories were built upon the work of Ivan Pavlov. Pavlov was well known for his research on a learning process called classical conditioning. Classical conditioning refers to learning that occurs when a neutral stimulus becomes associated with a stimulus that naturally produces a behavior. Pavlov earned the 1904 Nobel Prize in Psychology for his work on the theory of classical conditioning. In Watson's case, Little Albert became afraid of furry, white objects because he associated them with a scary noise. Similar to the work of Watson but more developed, in Pavlov's case, dogs drooled when they heard a ringing bell because they associated the sound with food.

    For the purposes of our work with children, we can see how neutral stimulus become associated with naturally produces a behavior. Advertisements are a prime example of classical conditioning. Food advertisements are a great example of classical conditioning. We are conditioned to desire foods that look good. That's why we salivate when we see a commercial for our favorite steakhouse!

    B.F. Skinner: Operant Conditioning

    Table 1. Classical and Operant Conditioning Compared
    Type of ApproachClassical ConditioningOperant Conditioning
    Conditioning approach An unconditioned stimulus (such as food) is paired with a neutral stimulus (such as a bell). The neutral stimulus eventually becomes the conditioned stimulus, which brings about the conditioned response (salivation). The target behavior is followed by reinforcement or punishment to either strengthen or weaken it so that the learner is more likely to exhibit the desired behavior in the future.
    Stimulus timing The stimulus occurs immediately before the response. The stimulus (either reinforcement or punishment) occurs soon after the response.

    In discussing operant conditioning, we use several everyday words—positive, negative, reinforcement, and punishment—in a specialized manner. In operant conditioning, positive and negative do not mean good and bad. Instead, positive means you are adding something, and negative means you are taking something away. Reinforcement means you are increasing a behavior, and punishment means you are decreasing a behavior. Reinforcement can be positive or negative, and punishment can also be positive or negative. All reinforcers (positive or negative) increase the likelihood of a behavioral response. All punishers (positive or negative) decrease the likelihood of a behavioral response. Now let us combine these four terms: positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, positive punishment, and negative punishment (Table 2).

    Table 2. Positive and Negative Reinforcement and Punishment
    ReinforcementPunishment
    Positive Something is added to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Something is added to decrease the likelihood of a behavior.
    Negative Something is removed to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Something is removed to decrease the likelihood of a behavior.

    References

    Allen, K. E., Hart, B., Buell, J. S., Harris, F. R., & Wolf, M. (1964). Effects of social reinforcement on isolate behavior of a nursery school child. Child Development, 35(2), 511–518.

    Fryer, R. G. (n.d.). FINANCIAL INCENTIVES AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM RANDOMIZED TRIALS. Harvary University National Bureau if Economic Research.

    Gershoff, E. T. (2002). Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 539–579.

    Gerschoff, E. T. (2013). Spanking and child development: We know enough now to stop hitting our children. Child Development Perspectives, 7(3), 133-137.

    Krieg A., Xu Y., Cicero D. C. (2018). Comparing social anxiety between Asian Americans and European Americans: An Examination of Measurement Invariance. Assessment 25 564–577. 10.11

    Murphy, R. (2017). What is ‘negative punishment’? Definition and real-world examples. Care.com.

    OpenStax College. (n.d.). Psychology. OpenStax.

    Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. Macmillan Company.

    Shaffer, D. (2000). Social and Personality Development (4th Ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.

    Skinner, B. F. (1938). Behavior of organisms. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Skinner, B. F. (1961). Teaching machines. Scientific American, 205(3), 90-112.

    When the consequences of a behavior increase the likelihood that a behavior will occur again the behavior is?

    Reinforcer. A behavior (operant response) is sometimes more likely to occur in the future as a result of the consequences that follow that behavior. Events that increase the likelihood of a behavior occurring in the future are called reinforcers.

    What is the consequence that increases a possibility that behavior will occur?

    Consequences: Reinforcement and Punishment As one of the most important principles of behavior analysis, the process of reinforcement entails a consequence that increases the future likelihood of the behavior it follows. Such behavior change occurs over time following immediate reinforcement.

    When a consequence that follows a behavior decreases the likelihood of that behavior occurring again this is known as?

    Punishment is defined as a consequence that follows an operant response that decreases (or attempts to decrease) the likelihood of that response occurring in the future.

    Is removing desirable consequences to decrease the likelihood that a behavior will be repeated in the future?

    Negative reinforcement occurs when a certain stimulus (usually an aversive stimulus) is removed after a particular behavior is exhibited. The likelihood of the particular behavior occurring again in the future is increased because of removing/avoiding the negative consequence.