Research on differential association theory finds that having delinquent friends

References

• Agnew, R. (1985). Social control theory and delinquency: A longitudinal test.Criminology 23: 47–61.

  Inhaltsverzeichnis Show

  • When friends or parents demonstrate their disapproval of crime?
  • How does social learning theory explain delinquency?
  • What does the differential association theory suggest that offenders learn from their peers quizlet?
  • What are the three 3 sociological theories of crime and delinquency?

  Google Scholar 

• Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1981). De controletheorie van Travis Hirschi: toetsing van een causaal model. In Gunther Moor, L. G. H. (ed.),Grenzen van de jeugd, Ars Aequi Libri, Utrecht, pp. 57–77.

  Google Scholar 

• Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1983). De controletheorie voor het grote en het kleine verschil.Tijdschrift Criminol. 25: 96–104.

  Google Scholar 

• Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1984). De methode van zelfrapportage van delicten.Tijdschrift Criminol. 26: 295–308.

  Google Scholar 

• Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1985).Criminaliteit als sociaal leerproces. Een toetsing van de differentiëleassociatietheorie in de versie van K.-D. Opp, Gouda Quint, Arnhem.

  Google Scholar 

• Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1988). Massale criminaliteit, jeugd en de overheid.Delikt Delinkwent. 18: 151–163.

  Google Scholar 

• Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1989). Scaling and reliability problems in self-reported property crimes. In Klein, M. W. (ed.),Cross-National Research in Self-Reported Crime and Delinquency, Kluwer, Boston/Dordrecht, pp. 131–151.

  Google Scholar 

• Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1990). Schoolklaseffecten en crimineel gedrag: een multilevel-analyse van contextuele invloeden.Tijdschrift Criminol. 32: 1–12.

  Google Scholar 

• Bruinsma, G. J. N., and Zwanenburg, M. A. (1980).Deviante Socialisatie. Verslag van een pilot-study, Criminologisch Instituut, Nijmegen.

  Google Scholar 

• Bruinsma, G. J. N., Jongman, R., and Junger-Tas, J. (eds). (1985).Maatschappelijke bindingen en criminaliteit, Boom, Meppel.

  Google Scholar 

• Burgess, R. L., and Akers, R. L. (1966). A differential association reinforcement theory of criminal behavior.Soc. Problems 14: 128–147.

  Google Scholar 

• Carmines, E. G., and Zeller, R. A. (1979).Reliability and Validity Assessment, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

  Google Scholar 

• Cloward, R. A. (1959). Illegitimate means, anomie and deviant behavior.Am. Sociol. Rev. 24: 49–59.

  Google Scholar 

• Cloward, R. A., and Ohlin, L. E. (1960).Delinquency and Opportunity. A Theory of Delinquent Groups, Free Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Cohen, A. K., Lindesmith, A. L., and Schuessler, K. (eds.) (1965).The Sutherland Papers, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

  Google Scholar 

• Cressey, D. R. (1964).Delinquency, Crime and Differential Association, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.

  Google Scholar 

• Cressey, D. R. (1969). Epidemiology and individual conduct. In Cressey, D. R., and Ward, D. A. (eds.),Delinquency, Crime and Social Process, Harper & Row, New York, pp. 557–577.

  Google Scholar 

• Cressey, D. R. (1972). Role theory, differential association and compulsive crimes. In Rose, A. M. (ed.),Human Behavior and Social Processes. An Interactionist Approach, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp. 443–467.

  Google Scholar 

• de Fleur, M. L., and Quinney, R. (1966). A reformulation of Sutherland's differential association theory and a strategy for empirical validation.J. Res. Crime Deling. 3: 1–22.

  Google Scholar 

• Farrington, D. P., Ohlin, L. E., and Wilson, J. Q. (1986).Understanding and Controlling Crime, Toward a New Research Strategy, Springer, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Fiselier, J. P. S., and Verschuren, P. J. M. (1988). De differentiële associatietheorie als verklaring van crimineel gedrag.Tijdschrift Criminol. 30: 203–222.

  Google Scholar 

• Gaylord, M. S., and Galliher, J. F. (1988).The Criminology of Edwin Sutherland, Transaction Books, New Brunswick.

  Google Scholar 

• Glaser, D. (1969). Criminality theories and behavioral images. In Cressey, D. R. and Ward, D. (eds.),Delinquency, Crime and Social Process, Harper & Row, New York, pp. 515–530.

  Google Scholar 

• Glaser, D. (1978).Crime in our Changing Society, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Glueck, S. (1956). Theory and fact in criminology: A criticism of differential association.Br. J. Delinq. 7: 92–98.

  Google Scholar 

• Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., and Weis, J. G. (1981).Measuring Delinquency, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

  Google Scholar 

• Hirschi, T. (1969).Causes of Delinquency, University of California Press, Berkeley.

  Google Scholar 

• Hirschi, T. (1986). On the comparability of rational choice and social control theories of crime. In Cornish, D. B., and Clarkle, R. V. (eds.),The Reasoning Criminal. Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending, Springer Verlag, New York/Berlin, pp. 105–118.

  Google Scholar 

• Hirschi, T., and Gottfredson, M., (eds.) (1980).Understanding Crime. Current Theory and Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

  Google Scholar 

• Janowitz, M. (1975). Sociological theory and social control.Am. J. Sociol. 81: 82–108.

  Google Scholar 

• Jensen, G. F. (1972). Parents, peers and delinquent action: A test of the differential association perspective.Am. J. Sociol. 20: 84–103.

  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, R. E. (1979).Juvenile Delinquency and Its Origins: An Integrated Theoretical Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  Google Scholar 

• Junger-Tas, J., and Block, R. L. (eds.) (1988).Juvenile Delinquency in the Netherlands, Kugler, Amstelveen.

  Google Scholar 

• Krohn, M. D., and Massey, J. L. (1980). Social control and delinquent behavior: An examination of the elements of the bond.Sociol. Q. 21: 529–543.

  Google Scholar 

• Laub, J. H., and Sampson, R. J. (1991). The Sutherland-Glueck debate: On the sociology of criminological knowledge.Am. J. Sociol. 96: 1402–1440.

  Google Scholar 

• Lilly, J. R., Cullen, F. T., and Ball, R. A. (1989).Criminological Theory. Context and Consequences, Sage, Newbury Park.

  Google Scholar 

• Matsueda, R. L. (1982). Testing control theory and differential association: A causal modeling approach.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 489–504.

  Google Scholar 

• Matsueda, R. L. (1988). The current state of differential association theory.Crime Delinq. 34: 277–306.

  Google Scholar 

• Matza, D., and Sykes, G. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency.Am. J. Sociol. 22: 664–670.

  Google Scholar 

• Opp, K-D. (1974).Abweichendes Verhalten und Gesellschaftsstruktur, Luchterhand, Neuwied.

  Google Scholar 

• Rankin, J. H., and Wells, L. E. (1990). The effect of parental attachments and direct controls on delinquency.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 27: 140–165.

  Google Scholar 

• Sampson, R. J., and Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory.Am. J. Sociol. 94: 774–802.

  Google Scholar 

• Severy, L. J. (1973). Exposure to deviance committed by valued peer group and family members.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 10: 35–46.

  Google Scholar 

• Short, J. F., Jr. (1957). Differential association and delinquency.Soc. Problems 4: 233–239.

  Google Scholar 

• Short, J. F., Jr. (1958). Differential association with delinquent friends and delinquent behavior.Pacific Sociol. Rev. 1: 20–25.

  Google Scholar 

• Short, J. F., Jr. (1960). Differential association as a hypothesis: Problems of empirical testing.Soc. Problems 8: 14–24.

  Google Scholar 

• Springer, W. (1973).Kriminalitätstheorien und ihre Realitätsgehalt, Ferdinand Enke, Stuttgart.

  Google Scholar 

• Stratton, J. R. (1967). Differential identification and attitudes toward the law. Soc.Forces 46: 256–262.

  Google Scholar 

• Sutherland, E. H. (1924).Criminology, Lippincott, Chicago.

  Google Scholar 

• Sutherland, E. H. (1934, 1939, 1947).Principles of Criminology, Lippincott, Chicago.

  Google Scholar 

• Sutherland, E. H. (1956). Development of a theory. In Cohen, A. K., Lindesmith, A. L., and Schuessler, K. (eds.),The Sutherland Papers, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 13–59.

  Google Scholar 

• Sutherland, E. H. (1973).On Analyzing Crime, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  Google Scholar 

• Voss, H. L. (1964). Differential association and reported delinquent behavior: A replication.Soc. Problems 12: 78–85.

  Google Scholar 

• Wiatrowski, M., and Anderson, K. (1987). The dimensionality of the social bond.J. Quant. Criminol. 3: 65–81.

  Google Scholar 

• Wolfgang, M. E., and Ferracuti, F. (1969).The Subculture of Violence, Tavistock, London.

  Google Scholar 

Download references

When friends or parents demonstrate their disapproval of crime?

How does social learning theory explain delinquency?

What does the differential association theory suggest that offenders learn from their peers quizlet?

What are the three 3 sociological theories of crime and delinquency?