Was commissioned the first warden of the Auburn State Penitentiary in New York in 1821?

Abstract

Solitary confinement has been a perennial tool of control in US prisons, despite its status as a repeatedly delegitimized practice. Although there have been significant changes in punishment over time, solitary confinement has remained, mostly at the margins and always as a response to past failures, part of an unending search for greater control over prisoners. This history raises the question of how a discredited penal technology can nevertheless persist. We locate the source of this persistence in prison administrators' unflagging belief in solitary confinement as a last-resort tool of control. To maintain this highly criticized practice, prison administrators strategically revise, but never abandon, discredited practices in response to antecedent legitimacy struggles. Using solitary confinement as a case study, we demonstrate how penal technologies that violate current sensibilities can survive, despite changing macro-level social factors that otherwise explain penal change and practice, provided those technologies serve prison officials' internal goals.

References

51st Annual Report of the Inspectors of the State Penitentiary for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. 1881. Philadelphia, PA: McLaughlin Brothers.Google Scholar

Barker, V. 2009. The Politics of Imprisonment: How the Democratic Process Shapes the Way American Punishes Offenders. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, H. E. 1921. “The Historical Origin of the Prison System in America.” Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology 12 (1): 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckett, K. 1997. Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bissonnette, J., with Hamm, R., Dellelo, R., and Rodman, E. 2008. When the Prisoners Ran Walpole: A True Story in the Movement for Prison Abolition. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

BPDS. [1826] 1827. First Annual Report of the Board of Managers of the Boston Prison Discipline Society. Boston: T. R. Marvin.Google Scholar

Campbell, M. C. 2011. “Politics, Prisons, and Law Enforcement: An Examination of the Emergence of ‘Law and Order’ Politics in Texas.” Law & Society Review 45 (3): 631–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, M. C. 2014. “The Emergence of Penal Extremism in California: A Dynamic View of Institutional Structures and Political Processes.” Law & Society Review 48 (2): 377–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crewe, B. 2011. “Soft Power in Prison: Implications for Staff-Prisoner Relationships, Liberty and Legitimacy.” European Journal of Criminology 8 (6): 455–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cummins, E. 1994. The Rise and Fall of California's Radical Prison Movement. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

DeAvila, J. 2017. “Prisons Balk at Curbing Isolation.” US News, April 30, A-3.Google Scholar

DeBeaumont, G., and deTocqueville, A. 1833. On the Penitentiary System in the United States and its Application in France. Philadelphia: Carey, Lea, and Blanchard.Google Scholar

Dickens, C. [1842] 2000. American Notes. Ed. Ingham, Patricia. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Dolan, J. 2011. “Indefinite Solitary Confinement Persists in California Prisons.” Los Angeles Times, September 5.Google Scholar

Doll, E. E. 1957. “Trial and Error at Allegheny: The Western State Penitentiary, 1818–1838.” Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 81 (1): 3–27.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. [1893] 1984. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Eason, J. M. 2017. Big House on the Prairie: Rise of the Rural Ghetto and Prison Proliferation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeley, M. M., and Rubin, E. 2000. Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America's Prisons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Feeley, M. M., and Simon, J. 1992. “The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications.” Criminology 30 (4): 449–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Garland, D. 1985. Punishment and Welfare. Brookfield, VT: Gower.Google Scholar

Garland, D. 1990. Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garland, D. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garland, D. 2012. Peculiar Institution: America's Death Penalty in an Age of Abolition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, P. 2008. “‘It's Just Black, White, or Hispanic’: An Observational Study of Racializing Moves in California's Segregated Prison Reception Centers.” Law & Society Review 42 (4): 735–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, P., Page, J., and Phelps, M. 2015. “The Long Struggle: An Agonistic Perspective on Penal Development.” Theoretical Criminology 19 (3): 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, P., Page, J., and Phelps, M. 2017. Breaking the Pendulum: The Long Struggle Over Criminal Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grassian, S. 2006. “Psychiatric Effects of Solitary Confinement.” Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 22:325–83.Google Scholar

Haney, C. 2017. “‘Madness’ and Penal Confinement: Some Observations on Mental Illness and Prison Pain.” Punishment & Society, online first. doi:10.1177/1462474517705389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haney, C., and Lynch, M. 1997. “Regulating Prisons of the Future: A Psychological Analysis of Supermax and Solitary Confinement.” NYU Review of Law & Social Change 23:477–570.Google Scholar

Hepburn, J. 1985. “The Exercise of Power in Coercive Organizations: A Study of Prison Guards.” Criminology 23 (1): 145–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ibsen, A. Z. 2013. “Ruling by Favors: Prison Guards' Informal Exercise of Institutional Control.” Law & Social Inquiry 38 (2): 342–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, J. 2005. The Warehouse Prison: Disposal of the New Dangerous Class. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.Google Scholar

Kennedy, J. E. 2000. “Monstrous Offenders and the Search for Solidarity Through Modern Punishment.” Hastings Law Journal 51:829–908.Google Scholar

Kumar, A. 2012. “Virginia Plans Changes in Prisoner Isolation Process.” Washington Post, March 30.Google Scholar

LaChance, D. 2016. Executing Freedom: The Cultural Life of Capital Punishment in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, O. F. 1922. The Development of American Prisons and Prison Customs, 1776–1845: With Special Reference to Early Institutions in the State of New York. Albany, NY: Prison Association of New York.Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, A. 1996. Twice the Work of Free Labor: The Political Economy of Convict Labor in the New South. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Liebling, A. 2000. “Prison Officers, Policing and the Use of Discretion.” Theoretical Criminology 4 (3): 333–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, S. 2015. “Law's Social Forms: A Powerless Approach to the Sociology of Law.” Law & Social Inquiry 40 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lownes, C. [1793] 1799. An Account of the Alteration and Present State of the Penal Laws of Pennsylvania, Containing Also, an Account of the Gaol and Penitentiary House of Philadelphia—and the Interior Management Thereof. Boston: Young & Minns.Google Scholar

Lynch, M. 2010. Sunbelt Justice: Arizona and the Transformation of American Punishment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

McLennan, R. M. 2008. The Crisis of Imprisonment: Protest, Politics, and the Making of the American Penal State, 1776–1941. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mears, D. P., and Bales, W. D. 2009. “Supermax Incarceration and Recidivism.” Criminology 47 (4): 1131–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mears, D. P., and Bales, W. D. 2010. “Supermax Housing: Placement, Duration, and Time to Reentry.” Journal of Criminal Justice 38 (4): 545–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mears, D. P., and Reisig, M. D. 2006. “The Theory and Practice of Supermax Prisons.” Punishment & Society 8 (1): 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melossi, D., and Pavarini, M. 1981. The Prison and the Factory: Origins of the Penitentiary System. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meranze, M. 1996. Laboratories of Virtue: Punishment, Revolution, and Authority in Philadelphia, 1760–1835. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Mitford, J. 1974. Kind and Usual Punishment: The Prison Business. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

National Prison Association. 1890. Proceedings of the Annual Congress of the National Prison Association of the United States, held at Cincinnati, September 25–30, 1890. Pittsburgh: Shaw Brothers.Google Scholar

Odier, P. 1982. The Rock: A History of the Fort/the Prison. Eagle Rock, CA: L'Image Odier.Google Scholar

O'Keefe, M. 2017. “Reflections on Colorado's Administrative Segregation Study.” National Institute of Justice Journal, 278: NCJ 250346.Google Scholar

Page, J. 2011. The Toughest Beat: Politics, Punishment, and the Prison Officers' Union in California. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powers, G. 1826. A Brief Account of the Constitution, Management, & Discipline &c. &c. of the New-York State Prison at Auburn. Auburn, NY: U. F. Doubleday.Google Scholar

Pratt, J. 2008. “Scandinavian Exceptionalism in an Era of Penal Excess: Part I: The Nature and Roots of Scandinavian Exceptionalism.” British Journal of Criminology 48:119–37.Google Scholar

Reiter, K. 2012. “The Most Restrictive Alternative: A Litigation History of Solitary Confinement in U.S. Prisons, 1960–2006.” Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 57:71–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiter, K. 2014a. “The Pelican Bay Hunger Strike: Resistance Within the Structural Constraints of a U.S. Supermax Prison.” South Atlantic Quarterly 113 (3): 579–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiter, K. 2014b. “Punitive Contrasts: United States vs. Denmark—A Socio-Legal Comparison of Two Prison Systems.” In The Criminal Justice and Law Enforcement Annual: Global Perspectives, ed. Sullivan, Larry, Vol. 6.1, 139–76. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar

Reiter, K. 2016. 23/7: Pelican Bay Prison and the Rise of Long-Term Solitary Confinement. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Reiter, K. Forthcoming. “The International Persistence & Resilience of Solitary Confinement.” Oñati Socio-Legal Series. Google Scholar

Reiter, K., and Blair, T. 2015. “Punishing Mental Illness: Trans-Institutionalization and Solitary Confinement in the United States.” In Extreme Punishment: Comparative Studies in Detention, Incarceration and Solitary Confinement, ed. Reiter, K. and Koenig, A., 177–96. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiter, K., and Coutin, S. 2017. “Crossing Borders and Criminalizing Identity: The Disintegrated Subjects of Administrative Sanctions.” Law & Society Review 51 (3): 567–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiter, K., and Koenig, A. 2015. Extreme Punishment: Comparative Studies in Detention, Incarceration and Solitary Confinement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rhodes, L. 2004. Total Confinement: Madness and Reason in the Maximum Security Prison. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Ross, J. I. 2013. The Globalization of Supermax Prisons. Newark, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Rothman, D. J. 1980. Conscience and Convenience: The Asylum and Its Alternatives in Progressive America. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Rubin, A. T. 2013. Institutionalizing the Pennsylvania System: Organizational Exceptionalism, Administrative Support, and Eastern State Penitentiary, 1829–1875. PhD diss., U.C. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Rubin, A. T. 2015a. “A Neo-Institutional Account of Prison Diffusion.” Law & Society Review 49 (2): 365–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, A. T. 2015b. “Resistance or Friction: Understanding the Significance of Secondary Adjustments.” Theoretical Criminology 19 (1): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, A. T. 2016. “Penal Change as Penal Layering: A Case Study of Proto-Prison Adoption and Capital Punishment Reduction, 1785–1822.” Punishment & Society 18 (4): 420–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, A. T. 2017a. “The Consequences of Prisoners' Micro-Resistance.” Law & Social Inquiry 42 (1): 138–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, A. T. 2017b. “Resistance as Agency? Incorporating the Structural Determinants of Prisoner Behaviour.” British Journal of Criminology 57 (3): 644–63Google Scholar

Rubin, A. T. Forthcoming a. “The Birth of the Penal Organization: Why Prisons Were Born to Fail.” In The Legal Process and the Promise of Justice, ed. Aviram, H., Greenspan, R., and Simon, J. Google Scholar

Rubin, A. T. Forthcoming b. “The Prehistory of Innovation: A Longer View of Penal Change.” Punishment & Society. Google Scholar

Rubin, A. T. In prep. The Deviant Prison: Eastern State Penitentiary and the Advantage of Difference, 1829–1913. Book manuscript.Google Scholar

Rusche, G., and Kirchheimer, O. 1939. Punishment and Social Structure. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schoenfeld, H. 2010. “Mass Incarceration and the Paradox of Prison Conditions Litigation.” Law & Society Review 44 (3–4): 731–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shalev, S. 2009. Supermax: Controlling Risk Through Solitary Confinement. London: Willan.Google Scholar

Shane, S. 2011. “Accused Soldier in Brig as Wikileaks Link Is Sought.” New York Times, January 13.Google Scholar

Sellin, T. 1953. “Philadelphia Prisons of the Eighteenth Century.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 43:326–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, J. 1993. Poor Discipline: Parole and the Social Control of the Urban Underclass, 1890–1990. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Simon, J. 2007. Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Simon, J. 2014. Mass Incarceration on Trial. New York: New Press.Google Scholar

Smith, P. S. 2006. “The Effects of Solitary Confinement on Prison Inmates: A Brief History and Review of the Literature.” Crime and Justice 34:441–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, P. S. 2009. “Solitary Confinement: History, Practice, and Human Rights Standards.” Prison Service Journal 181:3–11.Google Scholar

Sparks, R., Bottoms, A., and Hay, W. 1996. Prisons and the Problem of Order. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teeters, N. K. 1955. The Cradle of the Penitentiary: The Walnut Street Jail at Philadelphia, 1773–1835. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, H. A. 2016. Blood in the Water: The Attica Uprising of 1971 and Its Legacy. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Turnbull, R. J. 1797. A Visit to the Philadelphia Prison. Philadelphia: London; reprinted by James Phillips & Sons.Google Scholar

Wacquant, L. 2002. “The Curious Eclipse of Prison Ethnography in the Age of Mass Incarceration.” Ethnography 3 (4): 371–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ward, D. A., and Breed, A. F. 1984. The United States Penitentiary, Marion, Illinois: A Report to the Judiciary Committee, United States House of Representatives. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Wines, E., and Dwight, T. W. 1867. Report on the Prisons and Reformatories of the United States and Canada Made to the Legislature of New York, January 1867. Albany, NY: Van Benthuysen and Sons' Steam Printing House.Google Scholar

Zimring, F. 2003. The Great American Crime Decline. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ashker v. Governor. Case No. 4:09-cv-05796-CW (N.D. of Cal., Oakland Div. 2015). “Expert Report of Juan E. Méndez.”Google Scholar

Clonce v. Richardson, 379 F. Supp. 338, 345 (W.D. Mo. 1974).Google Scholar

Ruiz v. Texas, No. 16–7792 (Mar. 7, 2017) (J. Breyer, dissenting).Google Scholar

Toussaint v. McCarthy, 597 F. Supp. 1388 (N.D. Cal. 1984), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 801 F.2d 1080 (9th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1069 (1987).Google Scholar

United States v. Moreland, 258 U.S. 433, 449 (1922) (Brandeis, J., dissenting).Google Scholar

Pennsylvania. 1818. “An Act to Provide for the Erection of a State Penitentiary on the Public Land Adjoining the Town of Allegheny Opposite Pittsburg, in the County of Allegheny, and for Other Purposes.” In Acts of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 138–40. Harrisburg, PA: C. Gleim.Google Scholar

Pennsylvania. 1829. “No. 204: A Further Supplement to an Act, Entitled ‘An Act to Reform the Penal Laws of this Commonwealth.’” In Laws of the General Assembly of the State of Pennsylvania, 341–54. Harrisburg, PA: Office of the Reporter.Google Scholar

Who introduced the Auburn system in New York?

What was jail called in the 1800s?

What was the name of the first reformatory which opened in 1876?

Who was the first director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons quizlet?