 Show
The Tea Act became a lightning rod for American anger. The Tea Act did not make the Americans obedient, tax-paying subjects of the Crown, but defiant rebels against Parliament. Americans read the Tea Act asabrazen insult, a challenge to which they had to respond, and yet another disturbing sign of a British conspiracy against American welfare, liberty, and prosperity. On the night of December 16, 1773, perhaps as many as sixty Bostonians, organized by Samuel Adams and the Sons of Liberty,and a number of Boston tea smugglers, thinly disguised themselves as Mohawk natives, and boarded British East India Company ships docked in Boston Harbor.Working quietly, without a fuss,and methodically, under cover of night, the Americans dumped 342 chests of tea—forty-five tons of English tea—into the murky waters of Boston Harbor. The tea that was destroyed was worth almost £10,000(or nearly $700,000 in today's U.S. dollars). Prime Minister Lord North and Parliament responded with the Coercive Acts of 1774—known in America as the Intolerable Acts. For the Americans, the proverbial last straw was the Prohibitory Act, enacted by Parliament in December 1775, which placed a total British naval embargo against all imports entering the American colonies and a complete blockade on all exports leaving the colonies.Americans could not trade with the rest of the world—all communication, contact, and commerce with the outside world would be severed until all thirteen American colonies agreed to two conditions: the colonists had to beg for a pardon for their transgressions and lawlessness, and publicly submit to Parliament's fundamental right to govern and tax the American colonies in all cases whatsoever.Most Americans were not willing to agree to these disagreeable terms. The Battles of Lexington and Concord were the first military engagements of the American Revolutionary War.[9] They were fought on April 19, 1775, in Middlesex County, Province of Massachusetts Bay, within the towns of Lexington, Concord, Lincoln, Menotomy (present-day Arlington), and Cambridge, near Boston. The battles marked the outbreak of open armed conflict between the Kingdom of Great Britain and thirteen of its colonies on the mainland of British America. In late 1774 the Suffolk Resolves were adopted to resist the enforcement of the alterations made to the Massachusetts colonial government by the British parliament following the Boston Tea Party. The colonial assembly responded by forming an illegal Patriot provisional government known as the Massachusetts Provincial Congress and calling for local militias to train for possible hostilities. The rebel government exercised effective control of the colony outside of British-controlled Boston. In response, the British government in February 1775 declared Massachusetts to be in a state of rebellion. About 700 British Army regulars in Boston, under Lieutenant Colonel Francis Smith, were given secret orders to capture and destroy rebel military supplies reportedly stored by the Massachusetts militia at Concord. Through effective intelligence gathering, Patriot colonials had received word weeks before the expedition that their supplies might be at risk and had moved most of them to other locations. They also received details about British plans on the night before the battle and were able to rapidly notify the area militias of the British expedition. The first shots were fired just as the sun was rising at Lexington. The militia were outnumbered and fell back, and the regulars proceeded on to Concord, where they broke apart into companies to search for the supplies. At the North Bridge in Concord, approximately 400 militiamen engaged 100 regulars from three companies of the King's troops at about 11:00 am, resulting in casualties on both sides. The outnumbered regulars fell back from the bridge and rejoined the main body of British forces in Concord. The British forces began their return march to Boston after completing their search for military supplies, and more militiamen continued to arrive from neighboring towns. Gunfire erupted again between the two sides and continued throughout the day as the regulars marched back towards Boston. Upon returning to Lexington, Lt. Col. Smith's expedition was rescued by reinforcements under Brigadier General Hugh Percy, a future duke of Northumberland known as Earl Percy. The combined force, now of about 1,700 men, marched back to Boston under heavy fire in a tactical withdrawal and eventually reached the safety of Charlestown. The accumulated militias blockaded the narrow land accesses to Charlestown and Boston, starting the Siege of Boston. How did Britain's policy of salutary neglect contribute to the Revolutionary War quizlet?How did Britain's policy of salutary neglect affect the American colonies? It led to greater restrictions on colonial self-government. It led to an increased sense of independence from Britain. It led to greater trade restrictions with other European nations.
What effect did salutary neglect have on Britain's North American colonies quizlet?Effects of Salutary Neglect: colonists grow accustomed to the habit of self-government fostered by the Crown's indifference. assemblies grew stronger between 1700 and 1750. weild much power in colonial affairs, about on par witht the amount weilded by royal governors.
What was the period of salutary neglect quizlet?Salutary neglect is an American history term that refers to an unofficial and long-term 17th & 18th-century British policy of avoiding strict enforcement of parliamentary laws meant to keep American colonies obedient to England.
What was salutary neglect quizlet?Salutary Neglect is the British policy of letting the colonies ignore most of the British Laws. This policy changed when Britain was broke after the French and Indian war and needed the Colonies to start paying taxes and following their laws.
|
What did the British policy of salutary neglect of the American colonies in the early 18th century mean quizlet?
zusammenhängende Posts
Urheberrechte © © 2024 defrojeostern Inc.
