Which of the following is an advantage of exclusive dealing between a seller and a dealer

Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support . We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.

Get Started

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
$19.50/month

Yearly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
$199/year

Log in through your institution

Purchase a PDF

Purchase this article for $14.00 USD.

How does it work?

  1. Select the purchase option.
  2. Check out using a credit card or bank account with PayPal.
  3. Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.

journal article

Exclusive Dealing

The Journal of Law & Economics

Vol. 25, No. 1 (Apr., 1982)

, pp. 1-25 (25 pages)

Published By: The University of Chicago Press

https://www.jstor.org/stable/725222

Read and download

Log in through your school or library

Alternate access options

For independent researchers

Read Online

Read 100 articles/month free

Subscribe to JPASS

Unlimited reading + 10 downloads

Purchase article

$14.00 - Download now and later

Journal Information

Current issues are now on the Chicago Journals website. Read the latest issue.Established in 1958, The Journal of Law and Economics publishes research on a broad range of topics including the economic analysis of regulation and the behavior of regulated firms, the political economy of legislation and legislative processes, law and finance, corporate finance and governance, and industrial organization. The Journal has published some of the most influential and widely cited articles in these areas.

Publisher Information

Since its origins in 1890 as one of the three main divisions of the University of Chicago, The University of Chicago Press has embraced as its mission the obligation to disseminate scholarship of the highest standard and to publish serious works that promote education, foster public understanding, and enrich cultural life. Today, the Journals Division publishes more than 70 journals and hardcover serials, in a wide range of academic disciplines, including the social sciences, the humanities, education, the biological and medical sciences, and the physical sciences.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
The Journal of Law & Economics © 1982 The University of Chicago Press
Request Permissions

  • Exclusive dealing happens when one business trading with another puts conditions on the other’s freedom to choose what it buys or sells, who it does business with, or where it trades.
  • Exclusive dealing is common in business arrangements.
  • Exclusive dealing is only illegal when it substantially lessens competition.

What the ACCC does

  • We take reports of potentially anti-competitive behaviour, including exclusive dealing.
  • We investigate exclusive dealing arrangements that are potentially anti-competitive.
  • We enforce the law on exclusive dealing and can take court action against businesses that break the law.

What the ACCC can't do

  • We don’t intervene directly in disputes between businesses.

Exclusive dealing happens when one business trading with another business puts conditions on the other’s freedom to choose:

  • who it does business with
  • what business it does
  • where it does business.

For example, a supplier refuses to supply or refuses to give a particular price or discount, unless the purchaser agrees:

  • to buy products or services from an unrelated business, known as third line forcing
  • to buy all its range of products, even if the customer only wants to buy one, known as full line forcing
  • not to buy or resell products or services from the supplier’s competitors
  • not to resell the supplier’s products or services in certain areas, or to certain customers.

When a purchaser places restrictions on a supplier, this is also exclusive dealing.

For example, a purchaser refuses to buy from a supplier unless the supplier agrees not to supply the purchaser’s competitors.

Exclusive dealing is common in business arrangements. Often, it is legal because it doesn't substantially lessen competition.

Example 1 of exclusive dealing that isn't illegal

Scenario

An independent electronics store decides it will only buy from suppliers that agree not to supply its competitors. Because there are many other retailers and suppliers in the market, competition isn’t affected.

Relevant factors

While this is exclusive dealing, it isn’t illegal because it won't substantially lessen competition. There are many other retailers and suppliers in the market.

Example 2 of exclusive dealing that isn't illegal

Scenario

An office supplies retailer usually buys pencils from Business A and Business B. They are 2 of many available pencil suppliers. Business A tells the retailer it will only supply pencils if the retailer stops buying from Business B. The retailer stops buying pencils from Business B.

Relevant factors

Business A’s behaviour is exclusive dealing. However, it isn’t illegal, because it won’t substantially lessen competition. There are many other pencil suppliers in the market.

Exclusive dealing is illegal when it has the purpose, effect or likely effect of substantially lessening competition. This is more likely when:

  • the product or service can’t be bought elsewhere
  • the business setting the conditions is powerful.

For example, a business tries to stop another business from competing by telling its supplier not to sell a competitor something essential that the competitor can’t buy elsewhere. This can have both the purpose and effect of substantially lessening competition.

A business planning an exclusive dealing arrangement that risks breaking competition law can seek an exemption by lodging a notification with the ACCC.

Notification is an exemption process and gives protection from legal action.

We assess whether the conduct is likely to substantially lessen competition and, if so, whether it is still in the public interest.

Exclusive dealing notification guidelines

Exemptions

Competition and anti-competitive behaviour

Misuse of market power

Small business education program

Small business and the Competition and Consumer Act

Competition and Consumer Act 2010

  • Section 47 Exclusive dealing.

Share

What advantage using an exclusive dealing provide to the seller and a dealer?

Exclusive dealing arrangements generally promote more effective distribution by increasing dedication and loyalty; and they can minimize free-riding, improve product quality, and ensure customers and suppliers of a reliable source of supply.

Which of the following is an advantage of exclusive dealing between?

Which of the following is an advantage of exclusive dealing between a seller and a dealer? The dealer obtains a steady source of supply and more support from the seller.

Which of the following is a difference between storage warehouses and distribution Centres?

A warehouse is used for storing products while a distribution center, apart from storing products offers value-added services like product mixing, order fulfillment, cross docking, packaging etc. A distribution center stores products for relatively lesser periods compared to a warehouse.

Is a practice whereby a producer agrees to sell a brand to a dealer only if the dealer agrees to sell some or all of the rest of the producers merchandise?

Full-line forcing is a practice whereby a producer agrees to sell a brand to a dealer only if the dealer agrees to sell some or all of the rest of its line.