Which of the following statements is true of the person–environment fit approach to stress?

Author

Listed:

  • Jeffrey R. Edwards
  • Cary L. Cooper

Abstract

In recent years, the person-environment (P-E) fit approach to stress has become widely accepted among organizational stress researchers (Eulberg, Weekley and Bhagat, 1988). The P-E fit approach characterizes stress as a lack of correspondence between characteristics of the person (e.g. abilities, values) and the environment (e.g. demands, supplies). This lack of correspondence is hypothesized to generate deleterious psychological, physiological, and behavioral outcomes, which eventually result in increased morbidity and mortality. This basic framework forms the core of many current theories of organizational stress, such as those presented by French and his colleagues (French, Rogers and Cobb, 1974; French, Caplan and Harrison, 1982), McGrath (1976), Karasek (1979), Schuler (1980), and others.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey R. Edwards & Cary L. Cooper, 2013. "The Person-Environment Fit Approach to Stress: Recurring Problems and Some Suggested Solutions," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Cary L. Cooper (ed.), From Stress to Wellbeing Volume 1, chapter 5, pages 91-108, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-31065-1_5
    DOI: 10.1057/9781137310651_5

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-31065-1_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    Abstract

    The person-environment (P-E) fit approach to stress has gained widespread acceptance in the organizational stress literature. However, current research into the P-E fit approach to stress is repeatedly plagued with serious theoretical and methodological problems. Taken together, these problems severely threaten the conclusiveness of available empirical evidence and suggest that the current widespread acceptance of the P-E fit approach may be unwarranted. This article highlights theoretical and methodological problems characteristic of much P-E fit research and offers some solutions to these problems.

    Journal Information

    Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to report and review the growing research in the industrial/organizational psychology and organizational behavior fields throughout the world. The journal is focused on research and theory in all the topics associated with occupational/organizational behavior. These include motivation, work performance, equal opportunities at work, job design, career processes, occupational stress, quality of work life, job satisfaction, personnel selection, training, organizational change, research methodology in occupational/organizational behavior, employment, job analysis, behavioral aspects of industrial relations, managerial behavior, organizational structure and climate, leadership and power. Journal of Organizational Behavior is currently published 8 times a year.

    Publisher Information

    Wiley is a global provider of content and content-enabled workflow solutions in areas of scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly research; professional development; and education. Our core businesses produce scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly journals, reference works, books, database services, and advertising; professional books, subscription products, certification and training services and online applications; and education content and services including integrated online teaching and learning resources for undergraduate and graduate students and lifelong learners. Founded in 1807, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. has been a valued source of information and understanding for more than 200 years, helping people around the world meet their needs and fulfill their aspirations. Wiley has published the works of more than 450 Nobel laureates in all categories: Literature, Economics, Physiology or Medicine, Physics, Chemistry, and Peace. Wiley has partnerships with many of the world’s leading societies and publishes over 1,500 peer-reviewed journals and 1,500+ new books annually in print and online, as well as databases, major reference works and laboratory protocols in STMS subjects. With a growing open access offering, Wiley is committed to the widest possible dissemination of and access to the content we publish and supports all sustainable models of access. Our online platform, Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) is one of the world’s most extensive multidisciplinary collections of online resources, covering life, health, social and physical sciences, and humanities.

    Rights & Usage

    This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
    For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
    Journal of Organizational Behavior
    Request Permissions

    Which of the following is true according to the cognitive appraisal approach to stress?

    Which of the following is true according to the cognitive appraisal approach to stress? Emotions such as fear and rage cause the fight-or-flight response in individuals. Stress is mostly determined by an individual's perception.

    What is a defining characteristic of the person

    What is the person-environment fit approach to understanding stress? this approach emphasizes the idea that confusing and conflicting expectations of a person in a social role create stress for that person.

    Which approach to stress is based on the concept of homeostasis quizlet?

    stress. Strain is the same as: distress. The approach to stress that is based on the concept of homeostasis is known as: physiological.

    Which of the following is a common cause of workplace stress?

    The most common causes of work related stress are work pressure, poor organisation and lack of support from managers. While some people thrive under pressure and do their best work with a looming deadline, others find these kinds of challenges very stressful.

    Which of the following persons is most closely associated with the homeostatic and medical approach to stress?

    Walter B. Cannon is most closely associated with the homeostatic/medical approach to stress. He believed the body was designed with natural defense mechanisms to keep it in homeostasis.

    Which of the following is a leading cause of work stress for employees quizlet?

    Interrole conflict is caused by opposing expectations related to a single role. Dramatic changes at work and lack of control are some of the major causes of work stress. Role ambiguity and role conflict are two major categories of role stress at work.