 Show
The International Court of Justice, which has its seat in The Hague, On 5 August 2022, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland filed a declaration of intervention under Article 63 of the Statute of the Court in the case concerning Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation). Read more...On 28 July 2022, New Zealand filed a declaration of intervention under Article 63 of the Statute of the Court in the case concerning Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation). Read more...By an Order dated 22 July 2022, the Court fixed 24 April 2023 as the time-limit for the filing of the Counter-Memorial of Myanmar in the case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar). On 22 July 2022, the International Court of Justice delivered its Judgment on the preliminary objections raised by Myanmar in the case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar) by which it found that it has jurisdiction, on the basis of Article IX of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, to entertain the Application filed by The Gambia on 11 November 2019, and that the said Application is admissible. Read more...On 22 July 2022, the Republic of Lithuania filed a declaration of intervention under Article 63 of the Statute of the Court in the case concerning Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation). Read more...On 21 July 2022, the Republic of Latvia filed a declaration of intervention under Article 63 of the Statute of the Court in the case concerning Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation). Read more...On 4 July 2022, H.E. Mr. Edi Rama, Prime Minister of the Republic of Albania, paid a visit to the International Court of Justice at its seat at the Peace Palace in The Hague. Read more...The International Court of Justice — 75 Years in the Service of Peace and Justice, a new book marking the 75th anniversary of the inaugural sitting of the Court, will soon be available in English and French on the UN iLibrary website. Produced entirely by the Registry of the Court, it has been designed specifically with the general public in mind. Each short chapter covers a different facet of the institution, including its human face. Read more...By an Order dated 24 June 2022, the International Court of Justice fixed 8 December 2022 and 8 June 2023 as the respective time-limits for the filing of the Reply of the Republic of Guatemala and of the Rejoinder of Belize in the case concerning Guatemala’s Territorial, Insular and Maritime Claim (Guatemala/Belize). Read more...On 24 June 2022, ambassadors and representatives of the Group of Latin America and the Caribbean (GRULAC) States attended a presentation by H.E. Mr. Philippe Gautier, Registrar of the Court, on the work and activities of the ICJ. Read more...On 21 June 2022, a commemorative event jointly organized by the International Court of Justice and the Embassy of the Republic of Panama to the Kingdom of the Netherlands was held in the Great Hall of Justice of the Peace Palace to pay tribute to Ricardo Joaquín Alfaro, former Judge and former Vice-President of the Court. Read more...The International Court of Justice announces the publication of the two volumes of I.C.J. Pleadings, Immunities and Criminal Proceedings (Equatorial Guinea v. France). These volumes of the I.C.J. Pleadings contain the Application instituting proceedings, the written pleadings, the verbatim records of the hearings and other documents filed by the Parties in the case. Read more...The International Court of Justice announces the publication of the 2020 edition of its Reports of Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders. This most recent volume of the I.C.J. Reports series contains all the decisions rendered by the Court in 2020. Read more...By an Order dated 13 June 2022, the International Court of Justice fixed 7 October 2022 as the time-limit within which the Cooperative Republic of Guyana may present a written statement of its observations and submissions on the preliminary objections to the admissibility of the Application, raised, on 7 June 2022, by the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela in the case concerning the Arbitral Award of 3 October 1899 (Guyana v. Venezuela). By an Order dated 10 June 2022, the International Court of Justice fixed 12 June 2023 and 12 June 2024 as the respective time-limits for the filing of the Memorial by the Federal Republic of Germany and of the Counter-Memorial by the Italian Republic in the case concerning Questions of Jurisdictional Immunities of the State and Measures of Constraint against State-Owned Property (Germany v. Italy). Read more...The court has taken steps to ease the previous measures adopted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic which include a return to in-person working methods for the Court’s public hearings and other sessions taking place in the Great Hall of Justice, as well as for its private meetings. Read more...It is with great sadness that the International Court of Justice announces the passing of H.E. Judge Antônio Augusto Cançado Trindade, a Member of the Court, on 29 May 2022 in Brazil. Read more...On 19 May 2022, H.E. Mr. Nikolaos Dendias, Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Hellenic Republic, accompanied by a large delegation, paid a visit to the Court. Mr. Dendias and his delegation were received by H.E. Judge Joan E. Donoghue, President of the Court, and H.E. Mr. Philippe Gautier, Registrar. During the meeting, the President of the Court mentioned its high level of activity. The Greek Minister expressed his country’s ongoing support to the Court. Read more...Which of the following describes a difference between the Iranian and Nigerian legislators?Which of the following describes a difference between the Iranian and Nigerian legislatures? The Iranian legislature is unicameral, while the Nigerian legislature is bicameral.
Which of the following statements best describes the judiciary in Russia and Nigeria?Which of the following statements best describes the judiciary in Russia and Nigeria? The British judiciary uses common law to enforce rule of law, whereas the Russian judiciary uses the judiciary to target opposition.
Which of the following is true of the electoral systems for the legislatures in Nigeria and Mexico?Which of the following is true of the electoral systems for the legislatures in Nigeria and Mexico? Mexico uses a mix of proportional and first-past-the-post representation while Nigeria uses only first-past-the-post.
Which of the following most accurately compares the national legislature of Iran and the United Kingdom?Which of the following most accurately compares the national legislature of Iran and the United Kingdom? In both countries. the legislatures approve legislation and oversee the budget. Which of the following is true of the bureaucracy in Mexico?
|
Which of the following statements is true with regard to the judicial systems in nigeria and iran?
zusammenhängende Posts
Urheberrechte © © 2024 defrojeostern Inc.
