Why is it important to refer to the limitations of the study in the conclusion?

Q: Why is it important to refer to the limitations of the study in the conclusion the limitations of the study?

Keep in mind that acknowledgment of a studys limitations is an opportunity to make suggestions for further research. If you do connect your studys limitations to suggestions for further research, be sure to explain the ways in which these unanswered questions may become more focused because of your study.

Planning to Write

Inhaltsverzeichnis Show

Video Content: Research Limitations
Examples of Research Limitations
Where Should Research Limitations be Included in the Thesis?
Download the Article
Final Thoughts
Why is it important to refer to the limitations of the study in the conclusion the limitations of the study?
Why is it important to mention limitations in research?
Is limitation of the study part of conclusion?

2 Answers to this question

Answer:

The limitations of a study are its flaws or shortcomings which could be the result of unavailability of resources, small sample size, flawed methodology, etc. No study is completely flawless or inclusive of all possible aspects. Therefore, listing the limitations of your study reflects honesty and transparency and also shows that you have a complete understanding of the topic.

Generally speaking, the limitations are added in the Discussion section, just before the concluding paragraph. While you should definitely point out the limitations, do not get into an elaborate discussion about them. Keep this section short and crisp. The limitations of a study basically discusses any unanswered questions that your study did not address. Could you have used another means or method of data collection? Could the research design have been better? Was the sample not representative of the target population? Being self-critical and acknowledging the study’s limitations will give the impression that you are aware of what the study was not able to cover. Moreover, it would prevent the peer reviewer from pointing them out.

To learn in depth how to write an effective results section, check out this course designed exclusively for researchers: How to write the most effective results and discussion sections.

Related reading:

In a manuscript, are the Discussion and Conclusion sections the same?
The secret to writing the results and discussion section of a manuscript
INFOGRAPHIC: 5 Differences between the results and discussion sections

Answered by on 22 May, 2019

Resources for authors and journals

Upvote this Answer
53

Answer:

The limitations in a study are the challenges in design or methodology that affected the interpretation of your findings. All research studies have limitations. However, you must not shift the focus of your research paper to the limitations. Rather, you should briefly describe the limitations. If you do not capture the limitations in the methodology, you can include them in the conclusion. You can learn more about how to write a research paper conclusion on; How to Write a Conclusion for a Research Paper - Quest Writers .

Upvote this Answer
4

This content belongs to the Conducting Research Stage

Conducting research is the first and most exciting step in a researcher's journey. If you are currently in this stage of your publishing journey, subscribe & learn about best practices to sail through this stage and set yourself up for successful publication.

Do you know someone who thinks they are simply perfect and has no faults? (Well, I know a few and some even become presidents of extremely important countries).

Well, as shocking and disappointing as it may seem to some people: no one is perfect! Some are too tall, some too short, some enjoy country music (nothing personal), some add water to their fine whiskey (honestly, why?) and some do not drink coffee.

The conclusion is: we all have some negative sides! And research is no different!

And what is considered a limitation of a study?

A limitation is any aspect that hinders a study and its findings.

Does it mean that if my study has limitations it is useless? NO!!!!!!!!!!!

Very often researchers (students or well established researchers) have concerns about clearly describing the limitations of their studies. Why? Because there is sometimes a misconception that if your research limitations are too clear, readers will undermine the relevance of your work. For example, you might be afraid others will think:

“Why are these findings relevant if there are so many limitations to the study?”

All right, first let us make some things clear here:

EVERY STUDY HAS LIMITATIONS.
Clarifying the limitations of a study allows the reader to better understand under which conditions the results should be interpreted.
Clear descriptions of limitations of a study also show that the researcher has a holistic understanding of his/her study. And this is something very positive!

In other words, clearly describing the limitations of your study should only strengthen your work!

ALSO CHECK: Read our “STEP BY STEP Thesis Guide” with Many More Tips!

Video Content: Research Limitations

In case you are enjoying the article, do not forget to watch the video with further support on how to deal with your research limitations.

Examples of Research Limitations

Ok, you got it so far that no one is perfect, that some weird people become presidents and that research limitations should be included in your work.

I guess the next question would be: which limitations should I mention?

Look, it is extremely difficult to describe all possible types of research limitations. It will vary greatly depending on the type and nature of the study.

However, here are some examples:

Sample Size
- Often studies wish to understand a specific topic (e.g. Brazilian consumers’ perceptions towards a product) but only conduct a study with 50 participants. Considering that the Brazilian population has around 200 million people, can we generalize the results based on only 50 respondents? Clearly NOT! So consider your sample size in relation to the population of your study.
Sample Profile
- For example, many academic studies have used student sampling. There are many advantages for this, such as easy access and low costs for data collection. Nonetheless, using purely student sampling is also extremely limiting if the population of the study is comprised of people with varies profiles.
Method
- Very often, a method is accurate for a research aim, but it also includes many limitations. For example: Imagine you wish to understand consumers’ use of toilet paper (weird topic, isn’t it?) and the researcher uses in-depth interviews, as the study has an exploratory nature. Would you, as a respondent, feel comfortable to describe your use of toilet paper to a stranger? Probably not! Thus, your answers might be highly biased according to what is expected from him/her or to what is socially acceptable. So your answers might not exactly resemble the truth, due to the method.
Data Collection Process
- In the example above, the presence of the researcher influenced the responses, right? But would it be different if the interview had been done over the phone? Perhaps yes. Why? Because the topic is sensitive and private (Literally!). So the point is: the way in which you collect data can represent a strong limitation. Some researchers collect data in busy areas such as train stations where there are many distractions and respondents are in a rush. Is this a limitation? Certainly! Thus, you must reflect to see if the way in which you collected your data represents a limitation.
Equipment
- Imagine you are developing a study involving virtual reality (VR). You can use many different VR devices, ranging from very expensive ones (that have an extraordinary immersion experience) to cheaper ones (that will provide an immersive experience, but not as real). In other words, the type of device used influenced the study results. So if you use an equipment (e.g. devices, products, etc.) you have to consider if the type used represents a limitation or a strength of your work.
Time
- Often students have a deadline to turn in their work. Other academics have conference or journal deadlines. Would we do better work if we had more time? Of course! Do we have unlimited time to do research and collect data? NO! For this reason, “time” is a very common limitation for many studies.
Timing of Study
- Are you investigating a phenomenon long after it happened? Did you collect your data in a period that was not exactly suitable for respondents for some specific reason? All of these are examples of how timing might represent a strong limitation for studies.
Financial Resources
- Money is always a problem (at least for me. If it is not for you, we should be friends!). Sometimes we need it to purchase the necessary equipment for a study, to hire people for data collection, to purchase a specific statistical software or to simply reward participants with products or giveaways for having participated in the study. When financial resources are scarce, all of these possibilities are compromised. Consequently, such limitations might be reflected in the results of the study.
Access to Literature
- In the majority of cases, studies start when researchers identify gaps in the literature and try to address them. However, the identification or understanding that there is a gap depends on the researchers’ level of access to the existing literature. What may seem as a research gap might be a huge misconception simply because the person did not have access to a larger range of scientific literature. Thus, access to literature can also be a limitation.
Age of Data
- If your study is based on secondary data, pay extra care to the age of the data. Making current assumptions based on old data represents a strong limitation.

Where Should Research Limitations be Included in the Thesis?

Once you are done thinking and considering the limitations of your work, a simple question may arise: Where in my thesis should I include such limitations?

Please note: there is no specific format to this and it may vary from supervisor to supervisor, and sometimes certain universities may have their own guidelines. But USUALLY, the limitations are the VERY LAST section of your thesis, and they appear after the MANAGERIAL RECOMMENDATIONS.

And why? Because as mentioned above, the limitations may be due to any section of your work. For example:

Access to literature (literature review or theoretical background)
Method and data collection process (methodology)
Statistical software (analysis)

For this reason, it doesn’t really make much sense to have it in any other section of your work but the very END.

Got it? Great! Now go ahead and be honest with the limitations of your work! Reviewers will be positively impressed!

Download the Article

Did you like the article and would like to have it with you? Simple!

DOWNLOAD: LiveInnovation.org - Writing Research Limitations.pdf

Final Thoughts

Please note: All the suggestions here are personal, according to my own supervision style. Feel absolutely free to discuss them with your supervisor or other academics. Each one tends to have their own style and expectations.

Hope these tips have been useful for you and wish you all the best!

Why is it important to refer to the limitations of the study in the conclusion the limitations of the study?

Keep in mind that acknowledgment of a study's limitations is an opportunity to make suggestions for further research. If you do connect your study's limitations to suggestions for further research, be sure to explain the ways in which these unanswered questions may become more focused because of your study.

Why is it important to mention limitations in research?

Limitations are important to understand for placing research findings in context, interpreting the validity of the scientific work, and ascribing a credibility level to the conclusions of published research. This goes beyond listing the magnitude and direction of random and systematic errors and validity problems.