Show
Recommended textbook solutions
 Politics in States and Communities15th EditionSusan A. MacManus, Thomas R. Dye 177 solutions
Government in America: Elections and Updates Edition16th EditionGeorge C. Edwards III, Martin P. Wattenberg, Robert L. Lineberry 269 solutions
American Government1st EditionGlen Krutz 412 solutions Criminal Justice in America9th EditionChristina Dejong, Christopher E. Smith, George F Cole 105 solutions Upgrade to remove ads Only ₩37,125/year
Class Activity: pages 1024-1025 Answer the following questions regarding the Bakke case: Terms in this set (4)1. Why was affirmative action started? Explain. The affirmative action was started because the school wanted to correct the constant, unfair minority exclusions from the medical profession. 2. What did the Court say about the Constitutionality of affirmative action programs? The court said it was unconstitutional but race could still be used as a factor of admissions. If 2 people (both with the same level of education) who were separate races (ex: one African American, and the other white) the school had the right to choose because of the race but it could not be the only reason. 3. What rights did the Court grant university admissions programs? The court granted the university the right to still consider race into their admissions decisions. "He noted that Bakke—not the Texas case—was the law of the land, and schools still had the right to consider race in admissions decisions." (page 1025) 4. Do you agree with the court's decision? Why or why not?(Opinion) I do not agree with the court because race really should not be a factor in why or why not a student gets accepted to a school or not. This could affect the student's future success and the success of one kid or student could help boost the nation's economy. Other sets by this creatorChapter 33: Section 4- Foreign Policy After the Co…12 terms jpaz03 Chapter 33: Section 3- Social Concerns in the 1980s12 terms jpaz03
Chapter 33: Section 2- Conservative Policies Under…4 terms jpaz03
Chapter 33 - Section 2: Conservative Policies Unde…3 terms jpaz03 Other Quizlet setsPOSSIBLE TEST QUESTIONS83 terms nadiaedgarPLUS Chapter 1: World Civilizations23 terms jgay3084 Communications Theory Final57 terms quizlette17033 Bio 110 Final Exam81 terms Gia_Galante8 Recommended textbook solutionsAmerican Corrections11th EditionMichael D. Reisig, Todd R. Clear 160 solutions American Government1st EditionGlen Krutz 412 solutions Government in America: Elections and Updates Edition16th EditionGeorge C. Edwards III, Martin P. Wattenberg, Robert L. Lineberry 269 solutions
Criminal Justice in America9th EditionChristina Dejong, Christopher E. Smith, George F Cole 105 solutions What was the Court's decision in Regents of the University of California v Bakke?Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a 1978 Supreme Court case which held that a university's admissions criteria which used race as a definite and exclusive basis for an admission decision violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
What resulted from the Supreme Court's ruling in Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978 )? Quizlet?What was the Supreme Court's ruling in the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke case of 1978? The court ruled that the use of racial quotas in college admissions was unconstitutional.
How did the Supreme Court rule in the Bakke case quizlet?What was the ruling in the Bakke case? The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that Bakke's rejection was illegal and order the medical school to admit him.
Why is Regents of the University of California v Bakke importance?Bakke decision, formally Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, ruling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidated the use of racial quotas.
|
What was the Courts rationale for the University of California Regents v Bakke quizlet?
zusammenhängende Posts
Urheberrechte © © 2024 defrojeostern Inc.
