Which of the following factors does not influence the strength of respondent conditioning?

Inhaltsverzeichnis Show

Publisher Summary
Cited by (0)
What factors influence respondent conditioning?
What are the 4 principles of conditioning?
What are some examples of respondent conditioning?
Which procedure is most likely to result in respondent conditioning?

Access through your institution

Publisher Summary

Instead of specifying the notion of information formally, this chapter examines some of the empirical operations and results which have led investigators to the intuition that information matters in conditioning. The chapter then suggests a theory, which acknowledges the importance of these operations in producing conditioning and discuss some empirical assessments of that theory. To the degree that the theory accounts for those operations which suggest the intuition of information, it can be viewed as an explication of that intuition, however, that notion does not enter into the theory itself. As the theory is explored, a number of points are discovered at which it provides a better account of the data than does the original intuition. Consequently, it is suggested that although the informational intuition serves an initially useful purpose, it does not provide an adequate conceptualization around which the understanding of Pavlovian conditioning can be organized.

Cited by (0)

View full text

References

Annau, Z., and Kamin, L. J. The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the US.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1961,54, 428–432.
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Ayres, J. J. B., Benedict, J. O., and Wichter, E. S. Systematic manipulation of individual events in a truly random control procedure in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1975,68, 97–103.
Article Google Scholar
Baker, A. G. Conditioned inhibition arising from between sessions negative correlation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1977,3, 144–155.
Article Google Scholar
Benedict, J. O., and Ayres, J. J. B. Factors affecting conditioning in the truly random control procedure in the rat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972,78, 323–330.
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Boakes, R. A., and Halliday, M. S., (Eds.).Inhibition and Learning. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Google Scholar
Dickinson, A., and MacKintosh, N. J. Classical conditioning in animals.Annual Review of Psychology, 1978,24, 587–612.
Article Google Scholar
Frey, P. W., and Sears, R. T. Model of conditioning incorporating the Rescorla-Wagner associative axiom, a dynamic attention process and a catastrophe rule.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 321–340.
Article Google Scholar
Gibbon, J. The contingecy problem in autoshaping. In C. M. Locurto, H. S. Terrace, and J. Gibbon (Eds.),Autoshaping and Conditioning Theory. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
Google Scholar
Gormezano, I. Classical conditioning. In B. Sidowski (Ed.),Experimental Method and Instrumentation in Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.
Google Scholar
Gormezano, I., and Coleman, S. R. Effects of partial reinforcement on conditioning, conditional probabilities, asymptotic performance and extinction of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 1975,10, 13–22.
PubMed Google Scholar
Gormezano, I., and Kehoe, E. J. Classical conditioning: Some methodological-conceptual issues. In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1975.
Google Scholar
Gormezano, I., and Moore, J. W. Classical conditioning. In K. H. Marx (Ed.),Learning: Processes. London: Collier-MacKmillan, 1969.
Google Scholar
Hearst, E. W. Some persistent problems in the analysis of conditioned inhibition. In R. A. Boakes and M. S. Halliday (Eds.),Inhibition and Learning. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Google Scholar
Holmes, J. G. Effects of backward pairings of the CS and US on classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response in the rabbit. A doctoral dissertation. Iowa City: University of Iowa, 1971.
Google Scholar
Jenkins, H. M., Barnes, R. A., and Barrera, F. J. Why autoshaping depends on trial spacing. In C. M. Locurto, H. S. Terrace, and J. Gibbon (Eds.),Autoshaping and Conditioning Theory. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
Google Scholar
Kahane, H.Logic and Philosophy. Belmont, Cal.: Wadsworth Publishing, 1978.
Google Scholar
Kamin, L. J. Attention-like processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.),Miami Symposium in the Prediction of Behavior: Aversive Stimulation. Miami: University of Miami Press, 1968.
Google Scholar
Kamin, L. J. Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell and R. M., Church (Eds.),Punishment. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts, 1969.
Google Scholar
Keller, R. J., Ayres, J. J. B., and Mahoney, W. J. Brief versus extended exposure to truly random control procedures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1977,3, 53–65.
Article Google Scholar
Kimble, G. M.Hilgard and Marguis’ Conditioning and Learning. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1961.

Google Scholar
Kremer, E. F. The Rescorla-Wagner model: Losses in associative strength in compound conditioned stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Process, 1978,4, 22–36.
Article Google Scholar
Kremer, E. F. Truly random and traditional control procedures in CER conditioning in the rat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1977,76, 441–448.
Article Google Scholar
Kremer, E. F. The truly random control procedure: Conditioning to the static cues.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1974,87, 700–707.
Article Google Scholar
Kremer, E. F., and Kamin, L. J. The truly random control procedure: Associative or nonassociative effects in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971,74, 203–210.
Article Google Scholar
Lubow, R. E., and Moore, A. U. Latent inhibition: The effect of non-reinforced pre-exposure to the conditioned stimulus.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1959,52, 415–419. 229
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Lubow, R. E. Latent inhibition.Psychological Bulletin, 1959,52, 415–419.
Google Scholar
Lynch, J. J., and Kakigi, S. The CS-US interval in classical conditioning: Some theoretical implications for learning theory. Unpublished observations
Mackintosh, N. J. A theory of attention: Variations in Associability of stimuli with reinforcement.Psychological Review, 1975,82, 276–298.
Article Google Scholar
MacKintosh, N. J. Cognitive or associative theories of conditioning: Implications of an analysis of blocking. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, and W. K. Honig (Eds.),Cognitive Process in Animal Behavior. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1978.
Google Scholar
Maleske, R. T., and Frey, P. W. Blocking in eyelid conditioning: Effect of changing the CS-US interval and introducing an intertriai interval.Animal Learning and Behavior, 1979,7, 452–456.
Article Google Scholar
Marchant, H. G. III, Mis, F. W., and Moore, J. W. Conditioned inhibition of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,95, 408–411.
PubMed Article Google Scholar
McAllister, W.R. Conditioning as a function of CS-US interval.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954,45, 417–422.
Article Google Scholar
McAllister, W. R., and McAllister, D. E. Behavioral measurement of conditioned fear. In F. R., Brush (Ed.),Aversive Conditioning and Learning. New York: Academic Press, 1971.

Google Scholar
Mis, E. W. A mid-brain stem circuit for conditioned inhibition of the nictitating membrane response in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cunicuius).Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1977,91, 975–988.
Article Google Scholar
Moscovitch, R., and LoLordo, V. M. Role of safety in the backward fear conditioning procedurr.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1968,66, 673–678.
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Pavlov, I. P.Conditioned Reflex. London: Oxford University Press, 1927.
Google Scholar
Pearce, J. M., and Hall, W. A. A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.Psychological Review, 1980,87, 532–552.
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Prokasy, W. F., and Gormezano, I. The effect of US omission in classical aversive and appetitive conditioning in rabbits.Animal Learning and Behavior, 1979,7, 80–88.
Article Google Scholar
Reiss, S., and Wagner, A. R. CS habituation produces a “latent inhibition” effect but no active conditioned inhibition.Learning and Motivation, 1972,2, 237–245.
Article Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. Conditioned inhibition and extinction. In A. Dickinson and R. A. Boakes (Eds.),Mechanisms of Learning and Motivation: A Memorial Volume to Jerzy Konorski. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1979.
Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. Conditioned inhibition of fear resulting from negative CS-US contingencies.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969(a),67, 504–509.
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. Pavlovian conditioned inhibition.Psychological Bulletin, 1969(b),72, 77–94.
Article Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.Psychological Review, 1967,84, 88–97.
Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1968,66, 1–5.
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. Some implications of a cognitive perspective in Pavlovian conditioning. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, and W. K. Honing (Eds.),Congnitive Processes in Animal Behavior. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1978.
Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement following prior inhibitory conditioning.Learning and Motivation, 1971,2, 113–123.
Article Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A., and Solomon, R. L. Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning.Psychological Review, 1967,84, 151–182.
Article Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A., and Wagner, A. R. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black and W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical Conditioning: II. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.
Google Scholar
Schneiderman, N., and Gormezano, I. Conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit as a function of the CS-USinterval.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1964,57, 188–195.
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Seligman, M. E. P. Control group and conditioning: A comment on operationism.Psychological Review, 1969,76, 484–491.
Article Google Scholar
Siegel, S., and Domjan, M. Backward conditioning as an inhibitory procedure.Learning and Motivation, 1971,2, 1–11.
Article Google Scholar
Stebbing, S. L.A Modern Introduction to Logic. New York: Harper & Row, 1961.
Google Scholar
Suiter, R. D., and LoLordo, V. M. Blocking of inhibitory Pavlovian conditioning in the conditioned emotional response procedure.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971,76, 137–144.
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Wagner, A. R. Stimulus selection and a “modified continuity theory.” In G. H. Bower and J. R. Spence (Eds.),The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Vol. 33. New York: Academic Press, 1969.
Google Scholar
Wagner, A. R., Mazur, J. E., Donegan, N. H., Pfautz, P. L. Evaluation of blocking and conditioned inhibition to a CS signalling a decrease in US-intensity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1980,6, 376–385.
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Wagner, A. R., and Rescorla, R. A. Inhibition of Pavlovian conditioning: Application of a theory. In R. A. Boakes and M. S., Halliday (Eds.),Inhibition and Learning. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Google Scholar
Willmer, J. A. Blocking of taste aversion by prior pairings of exteroceptive stimuli with illness.Learning and Motivation, 1978,9, 125–140.
Article Google Scholar

Download references

What factors influence respondent conditioning?

What is one of five factors that influence respondent conditioning? The nature of the US and CS. The temporal relationship between the CS and the US. Contingency between the CS and US.

What are the 4 principles of conditioning?

Principles of Classical Conditioning Those principles are: acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery, stimulus generalization, and stimulus discrimination.

What are some examples of respondent conditioning?

In respondent conditioning, the US could be an appetitive or aversive stimulus. For instance, in appetitive conditioning, the US would be something desirable such as candy which makes us happy. Other examples could include water, food, sex, or drugs.

Which procedure is most likely to result in respondent conditioning?

T F Backward conditioning is most likely to result in respondent conditioning. T F During spontaneous recovery, the magnitude of the CR is usually smaller than the magnitude of the CR that occurred prior to extinction.

Which of the following factors does not influence the strength of respondent conditioning?

Publisher Summary

Cited by (0)

References

What factors influence respondent conditioning?

What are the 4 principles of conditioning?

What are some examples of respondent conditioning?

Which procedure is most likely to result in respondent conditioning?

zusammenhängende Posts

Which factors should be considered when setting an advertising schedule? (select all that apply)

Which of the following factors contribute to increased intracranial pressure (icp) quizlet

Which of the following factors most likely would cause an auditor to decline a new engagement?

Which factors may affect an individual animal’s sensitivity to pain and response to analgesics?

Which of the following factors fueled the independence movements described in both sources?

What are the important factors to consider when deciding whether to buy disability insurance?

Is based on open systems theory and recognizes that there are many internal and external factors that influence organizational behavior?

Describe which two factors of the model when combined reflect the risk of material misstatements

What are the factors that should be taken into consideration while formulating HR policies?

What two factors should you consider when selecting sources for use in a research report quizlet?

Werbung

NEUESTEN NACHRICHTEN

Which incentive plans are specifically designed to promote group performance

According to the flsa, which individual is most likely a nonexempt employee?

Reactive and protective behaviors designed to avoid action, blame, or change are termed ________.

The machiavellian personality is characterized by the will to manipulate and the desire for power.

Ist ein mann in brunn gefallen noten

Which of the following biometric authentication systems is the most accepted by users?

Was ist der Unterschied zwischen Hanf und CBD?

Wie viele noten braucht man für eine zeugnisnote sachsen-anhalt

Wie fühlt man sich wenn man schwanger ist am anfang

Kann man Basaltemperatur auch tagsüber Messen?

Werbung

Populer

Werbung

Um

Legal

Hilfe

Sozial