Within the context of studying, which of the following would be related to an illusion?

References

Reference Notes

  1. Bridgeman, B. Induced motion: Relative motion or Roelofs effect. Paper read at the Twenty-third Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Karmiohl, C.M., & Shebilske, W.L. Behavioral vs. formal procedures of text analysis: Dis-course style, task demands, and reading strategies. Paper submitted for publication, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Masse, D. Le contrôle des movements oculaires. Thèse, Université de Grenoble, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shebilske, W.L. Minor motor anomalies cause visual illusions that affect dart throwing. Paper read at the Twenty-third Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneaplis, Minnesota, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shebilske, W.L., & Karmiohl, C.M. Toward a unified indirect perception theory. Paper submitted for publication, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Abrams, S.G., & Zuber, B.L. Some temporal characteristics of information processing during reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 1972, 8, 40–51.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, H., & DeVoogd, A.H. On the control of eye saccades in reading. Vision Research, 1974, 14, 273–284.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, T.G.R. Development in infancy. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., & Nagle, M. Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979, 5, 692–700.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E. Neuropsychological interference mechanisms in aphasia and dyslexia. In R. Rieber (Ed.), The neuropsychology of language: Essays in memory of Eric Lenneberg. New York: Plenum Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, P.A., & Just, M.A. Reading comprehension as eyes see it. In M.A. Just & P.A. Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension. New York: Wiley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C.C. The human oculomotor control system. In G. Lennerstrand & P. Bach-Y-Rita (Eds.), Basic mechanisms of ocular motility and their clinical implications. New York: Plenum, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coren, S. The interaction between eye movements and visual illusions. In D.F. Fisher, R.A. Monty, & J.W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craske, B., & Crawshaw, M. Spatial discordance is a sufficient condition for oculomotor adaption to prisms: Eye muscle potentiation need not be a factor. Perception and Psychophysics, 1978, 23, 75–79.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craske, B., Crawshaw, M., & Heron, P. Disturbance of the oculomotor system due to lateral fixation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975, 27, 459–465.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenholtz, S.M. Additivity of aftereffects of maintained head and eye rotations: An alternative to recalibration. Perception and Psychophysics, 1976, 19, 113–116.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenholtz, S.M. Hysteresis effects in the vergence control system: Perceptual implications. In D.F. Fisher, R.A. Monty, & J.W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebenholtz, S.M., & Wolfson, P.M. Perceptual aftereffects of sustained convergence. Perception and Psychophysics, 1915, 17, 485–491.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Burnham, C.A., Ono, H. & Bamber, D. Efference and the conscious experience of perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, Monograph 637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, J.M. Local and global influences on saccadic eye movements. In D.F. Fisher, R.A. Monty, & J.W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D.F. Understanding the reading process through the use of transformed typography: PSG, CSG and Automaticity. In P.A. Kolers, M.E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language, (Vol. 1 ). New York: Plenum, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogelgren, L.A., & Shebilske, W.L. Central visual learning and illusory visual direction after backward head tilts. Perception and Psychophysics, 1979, 25, 519–523.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K.I. Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W.E. Cooper & C.T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing. New York: Wiley, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, H. von A treatise on physiological optics, (Vol. 3). (J.P.C. Southall, Ed. and Trans.). New York: Dover, 1963 (originally published, 1806 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890) The principles of psychology, (Vol. 2). Holt. Reprinted, New York: Dover, 1950.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. A theory of reading: From eye fixation to comprehension. Psychological Review, 1980, 87, 329–354.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kliegal, R., Olson, R.K., & Davidson, B.J. Eye movements in reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Perceptual and linguistic aspects of reading. New York: Academic Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W.J.M. A survey of studies in sentence perception: 1970–1976. In W.J.M. Levelt & G. B. Flores d’Arcais (Eds.), Studies in the perception of language. New York: Wiley, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. Autokinesis direction during and after eye turn. Perception and Psychophysics, 1913, 13, 337–343.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Levy-Schoen, A., & O’Regan, K. The control of eye movements during reading. In P.A. Kolers, M.E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language, (Vol. 1 ). New York: Plenum Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, T.S. Eye movement research on the propositional structure of short texts. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1919, 11, 180–187.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Matin, L. Eye movements and perceived visual direction. In D. Jameson & L.M. Hurvich (Eds.), Handbook of sensory physiology, (Vol. 7 ). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matin, L. Visual localization and eye movements. In W.A. Wagemaar, A.H. Wertheim, & H. W. Leibowitz (Eds.), Symposium on the study of motion perception. New York: Plenum, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matin, L., Picoult, E., Stevens, J.K., Edwards, M.W., Young, D., & MacArthur, R. Oculoparalytic illusion: Visual-field dependent spatial mislocalization by humans paralyzed with curare. Science, 1982, 216, 198–201.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McConkie, G.W. Eye movements and perception during reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Perceptual and linguistic aspects of reading. New York: Academic Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. Harpy, production systems and human cognition. In R. Cole (Ed.), Perception and production of fluent speech. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noton, D., & Stark, L. Scanpaths in saccadic eye movements while viewing and recognizing patterns. Vision Research, 1911, 11, 929–942.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, K. Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 1979, 17, 578–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, K. The “convenient viewing position” hypothesis. In D.F. Fisher, R.A. Monty, & J.W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paap, K.R., & Ebenholtz, S.M. Perceptual consequences of potentiation in the extraocular muscles: An alternative explanation for adaptation to wedge prisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976, 2, 457–468.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J.N. Displacement of apparent straight ahead as an aftereffect of deviation of the eyes from normal position. Perceptual and Motor Skill, 1969, 28, 591–597.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K. Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception, 1979, 8, 21–30.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., & McConkie, G.W. What guides a reader’s eye movements? Vision Research, 1976, 16, 829–837.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R.P. Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shebilske, W.L. Reading eye movements from an information-processing point of view. In D. Massaro (Ed.), Understanding language. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shebilske, W.L. Extraretinal information in corrective saccades and inflow vs. outflow theories of visual direction constancy. Vision Research, 1976, 16, 621–628.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shebilske, W.L. Visuomotor coordination in visual direction and position constancies. In W. Epstein (Ed.), Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes. New York: Wiley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shebilske, W.L. Sensory feedback during eye movements reconsidered. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1978, 7, 160–161.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shebilske, W.L. Visual direction illusions in everyday situations: Implications for sensorimotor and ecological theories. In D.F. Fisher, R.A. Monty, & J.W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shebilske, W.L., & Fisher, D.F. Eye movements and context effects during reading of extended discourse. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Perceptual and linguistic aspects of reading. New York: Academic Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shebilske, W.L., & Fisher, D.F. Understanding extended discourse through the eyes: How and why. In R. Groner, D.F. Fisher, R.A. Monty, & C. Menz (Eds.), Eye movements: An international perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shebilske, W.L., & Fogelgren, L.A. Eye-position aftereffects of backward head tilts. Perception and Psychophysics, 1911, 21, 77–82.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shebilske, W.L., & Karmiohl, C.M. Illusory visual direction during and after backward head tilts. Perception and Psychophysics, 1978, 24, 543–545.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shebilske, W.L., Karmiohl, C.M., & Proffitt, D.R. Induced esophoric shifts and illusory distance in reduced and structured viewing conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1983, 9, 270–277.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shebilske, W.L., & Reid, S.L. Reading eye movements, macro-structure and comprehension processes. In P.A. Kolers, M.E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language, (Vol. 1 ). New York: Plenum Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shebilske, W.L., Rotondo, J.A. Typographical and spatial cues that facilitate learning from textbooks. Visible Language, 1981, 15, 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skavenski, A.A. The nature and role of extraretinal eye-position information in visual localization. In R.A. Monty & J.W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements and psychological processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, L., & Ellis, S.R. Scanpaths revisited; cognitive models direct active looking. In D.F. Fisher, R.A. Monty, & J.W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M.T. Contrasting orientations to the theory of visual information processing. Psychological Review, 1911, 84, 67–78.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M.T. The thesis of the efference-mediation of vision cannot be rationalized. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1919, 2, 59–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. Understanding natural language. Cognitive Psychology, 1972, 3, 1–191.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Which of the following is a key factor in the memory enhancing capacity of sleep quizlet?

Which of the following is a key factor in the memory-enhancing capacity of sleep? encoding specificity.

What is the most important factor in determining if a person sees an object change in a scene?

The basic idea is that people do not store many details of a scene in memory. Rather, the critical factor seems to be attention: In order to see an object change, it is necessary to attend to the object.

Which of the following correctly lists types of memory?

The four general types of memory are sensory memory, short-term memory, working memory, and long-term memory.

What is the generation effect characterized by?

The generation effect is a phenomenon where information is better remembered if it is generated from one's own mind rather than simply read. Researchers have struggled to account for why the generated information is better recalled than read information, but no single explanation has been sufficient.